These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

232 related items for PubMed ID: 7569140

  • 1. Critical pathways for the future: MR imaging and digital mammography.
    Newstead GM, Weinreb JC.
    Radiographics; 1995 Jul; 15(4):951-62. PubMed ID: 7569140
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Novel breast-imaging methods.
    Davison D.
    Clin J Oncol Nurs; 2005 Apr; 9(2):255-6. PubMed ID: 15853170
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Critical pathways in percutaneous breast intervention.
    Parker SH, Dennis MA, Stavros AT.
    Radiographics; 1995 Jul; 15(4):946-50. PubMed ID: 7569139
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Critical pathways in the analysis of breast masses.
    Rubin E.
    Radiographics; 1995 Jul; 15(4):925-7. PubMed ID: 7569136
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. MR imaging of the breast.
    Weinreb JC, Newstead G.
    Radiology; 1995 Sep; 196(3):593-610. PubMed ID: 7644617
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Magnetic resonance mammography in small vs. advanced breast lesions - systematic comparison reveals significant impact of lesion size on diagnostic accuracy in 936 histologically verified breast lesions.
    Dietzel M, Baltzer PA, Vag T, Gröschel T, Richter C, Burmeister H, Kaiser WA.
    Rofo; 2011 Feb; 183(2):126-35. PubMed ID: 20830650
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Benign adenomyoepithelioma of the breast: imaging findings mimicking malignancy and histopathological features.
    Ruiz-Delgado ML, López-Ruiz JA, Eizaguirre B, Saiz A, Astigarraga E, Fernández-Temprano Z.
    Acta Radiol; 2007 Feb; 48(1):27-9. PubMed ID: 17325921
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. [MR-mammography: current status and perspectives].
    Funke M, Fischer U, Grabbe E.
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1996 May; 6(3):130-5. PubMed ID: 8679736
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. [Comparison of full-field digital mammography and magnetic resonance imaging for breast disease diagnosis].
    Wang Q, Hu GD, Kuang J, Li JM.
    Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 2009 Feb; 29(2):292-4. PubMed ID: 19246303
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Digital mammography: current state and future aspects.
    Fischer U, Hermann KP, Baum F.
    Eur Radiol; 2006 Jan; 16(1):38-44. PubMed ID: 16132935
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Evaluation of the three-time-point method for diagnosis of breast lesions in contrast-enhanced MR mammography.
    Hauth EA, Stockamp C, Maderwald S, Mühler A, Kimmig R, Jaeger H, Barkhausen J, Forsting M.
    Clin Imaging; 2006 Jan; 30(3):160-5. PubMed ID: 16632149
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Nonmammographic breast imaging techniques: current status and future developments.
    Kopans DB.
    Radiol Clin North Am; 1987 Sep; 25(5):961-71. PubMed ID: 3306776
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 12.