These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

152 related items for PubMed ID: 7576520

  • 1. Preliminary study of microbiological parameters in eight inland recreational waters. Public Health Laboratory Service Water Surveillance Group.
    Lett Appl Microbiol; 1995 Oct; 21(4):267-71. PubMed ID: 7576520
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Impact of recreation on recreational water quality of a small tropical stream.
    Phillip DA, Antoine P, Cooper V, Francis L, Mangal E, Seepersad N, Ragoo R, Ramsaran S, Singh I, Ramsubhag A.
    J Environ Monit; 2009 Jun; 11(6):1192-8. PubMed ID: 19513450
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Relation between Aeromonas and faecal coliforms in fresh waters.
    Araujo RM, Arribas RM, Lucena F, Pares R.
    J Appl Bacteriol; 1989 Aug; 67(2):213-7. PubMed ID: 2553653
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Fecal coliform-related bacterial and coliphage populations in five lakes of southeastern Spain.
    Calvo C, Gómez MA, González-López J.
    Microbiol Res; 1998 Nov; 153(3):283-8. PubMed ID: 9880932
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. The influence of agricultural run-off on bacterial populations in a river.
    Fernández-Alvarez RM, Carballo-Cuervo S, de la Rosa-Jorge MC, Rodríguez-de Lecea J.
    J Appl Bacteriol; 1991 May; 70(5):437-42. PubMed ID: 1874685
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Comparison of BGB-MUG and LSTB-MUG in microbiological surveillance of recreational waters.
    Höller C, Havemeister G, Gundermann KO.
    Zentralbl Hyg Umweltmed; 1995 Dec; 198(2):138-51. PubMed ID: 9353533
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. [Comparative studies of fresh and seawater for the determination of total coliform and fecal coliform bacteria according to the European Economic Community guideline 76/160 (bathing water) by the use of the most-probable-number method with BRILA-MUG broth and differentiation according to the drinking water ordinance].
    Havemeister G, Aleksic S, Bockemühl J, Heinemeyer EA, Müller HE, Von Pritzbuer E.
    Zentralbl Hyg Umweltmed; 1991 May; 191(5-6):523-38. PubMed ID: 1883475
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Microbiological and compositional status of Turkish white cheese.
    Turantaş F, Unlütürk A, Göktan D.
    Int J Food Microbiol; 1989 Feb; 8(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 2701567
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Evaluation of coliforms as indicators of water quality in India.
    Ramteke PW, Bhattacharjee JW, Pathak SP, Kalra N.
    J Appl Bacteriol; 1992 Apr; 72(4):352-6. PubMed ID: 1517177
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Enumeration by a miniaturized method of Escherichia coli, Streptococcus bovis and enterococci as indicators of the origin of faecal pollution of waters.
    Pourcher AM, Devriese LA, Hernandez JF, Delattre JM.
    J Appl Bacteriol; 1991 Jun; 70(6):525-30. PubMed ID: 1938678
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Soil: the environmental source of Escherichia coli and Enterococci in Guam's streams.
    Fujioka R, Sian-Denton C, Borja M, Castro J, Morphew K.
    J Appl Microbiol; 1998 Dec; 85 Suppl 1():83S-89S. PubMed ID: 21182696
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.