These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

221 related items for PubMed ID: 7593915

  • 1. Signal properties that reduce masking by simultaneous, random-frequency maskers.
    Neff DL.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Oct; 98(4):1909-20. PubMed ID: 7593915
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Forward masking by maskers of uncertain frequency content.
    Neff DL.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Mar; 89(3):1314-23. PubMed ID: 2030218
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Intensity discrimination in the presence of random-frequency, multicomponent maskers and broadband noise.
    Neff DL, Jesteadt W.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Oct; 100(4 Pt 1):2289-98. PubMed ID: 8865636
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Differences in auditory performance between monaural and dichotic conditions. I: masking thresholds in frozen noise.
    Langhans A, Kohlrausch A.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Jun; 91(6):3456-70. PubMed ID: 1619122
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Individual differences in simultaneous masking with random-frequency, multicomponent maskers.
    Neff DL, Dethlefs TM.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Jul; 98(1):125-34. PubMed ID: 7608391
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Masking produced by broadband noise presented in virtual auditory space.
    Carlile S, Wardman D.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Dec; 100(6):3761-8. PubMed ID: 8969477
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Binaural masking experiments using noise maskers with frequency-dependent interaural phase differences. I: Influence of signal and masker duration.
    Kohlrausch A.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Oct; 88(4):1737-48. PubMed ID: 2262630
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Similarity, uncertainty, and masking in the identification of nonspeech auditory patterns.
    Kidd G, Mason CR, Arbogast TL.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Mar; 111(3):1367-76. PubMed ID: 11931314
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Frequency resolution for diotic and dichotic listening conditions compared using the bandlimiting measure and a modified bandlimiting measure.
    Cokely JA, Hall JW.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Mar; 89(3):1331-9. PubMed ID: 2030220
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. The phase angle of addition in temporal masking for diotic and dichotic listening conditions.
    Yost WA, Grantham DW, Lutfi RA, Stern RM.
    Hear Res; 1982 Aug; 7(3):247-59. PubMed ID: 7118730
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Comodulation masking release as a function of type of signal, gated or continuous masking, monaural or dichotic presentation of flanking bands, and center frequency.
    Fantini DA, Moore BC, Schooneveldt GP.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Apr; 93(4 Pt 1):2106-15. PubMed ID: 8473623
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Diotic and dichotic detection using multiplied-noise maskers.
    van de Par S, Kohlrausch A.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Apr; 103(4):2100-10. PubMed ID: 9566331
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 12.