These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

298 related items for PubMed ID: 7601645

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Visual function-specific perimetry for indirect comparison of different ganglion cell populations in glaucoma.
    Sample PA, Bosworth CF, Blumenthal EZ, Girkin C, Weinreb RN.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2000 Jun; 41(7):1783-90. PubMed ID: 10845599
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. The efficacy of the dicon screening field to detect eyes with glaucomatous field loss by Humphrey threshold testing.
    Huang AS, Smith SD, Quigley HA.
    J Glaucoma; 1998 Jun; 7(3):158-64. PubMed ID: 9627854
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Relationship between Humphrey 30-2 SITA Standard Test, Matrix 30-2 threshold test, and Heidelberg retina tomograph in ocular hypertensive and glaucoma patients.
    Bozkurt B, Yilmaz PT, Irkec M.
    J Glaucoma; 2008 Jun; 17(3):203-10. PubMed ID: 18414106
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Frequency doubling technology perimetry in open-angle glaucoma eyes with hemifield visual field damage: comparison of high-tension and normal-tension groups.
    Murata H, Tomidokoro A, Matsuo H, Tomita G, Araie M.
    J Glaucoma; 2007 Jan; 16(1):9-13. PubMed ID: 17224743
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Frequency-doubling perimetry: comparison with standard automated perimetry to detect glaucoma.
    Leeprechanon N, Giangiacomo A, Fontana H, Hoffman D, Caprioli J.
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2007 Feb; 143(2):263-271. PubMed ID: 17178091
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Screening for glaucomatous visual field loss with frequency-doubling perimetry.
    Johnson CA, Samuels SJ.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1997 Feb; 38(2):413-25. PubMed ID: 9040475
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Analysis of progressive change in automated visual fields in glaucoma.
    Smith SD, Katz J, Quigley HA.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1996 Jun; 37(7):1419-28. PubMed ID: 8641844
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Frequency doubling technology perimetry abnormalities as predictors of glaucomatous visual field loss.
    Medeiros FA, Sample PA, Weinreb RN.
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2004 May; 137(5):863-71. PubMed ID: 15126151
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. The statistical interpretation of blue-on-yellow visual field loss.
    Wild JM, Moss ID, Whitaker D, O'Neill EC.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1995 Jun; 36(7):1398-410. PubMed ID: 7775118
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Diagnostic sensitivity of fast blue-yellow and standard automated perimetry in early glaucoma: a comparison between different test programs.
    Bengtsson B, Heijl A.
    Ophthalmology; 2006 Jul; 113(7):1092-7. PubMed ID: 16815399
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Testing for glaucoma with frequency-doubling perimetry in normals, ocular hypertensives, and glaucoma patients.
    Horn FK, Wakili N, Jünemann AM, Korth M.
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2002 Aug; 240(8):658-65. PubMed ID: 12192460
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Computer-assisted interpretation of visual fields in glaucoma.
    Asman P.
    Acta Ophthalmol Suppl (1985); 1992 Aug; (206):1-47. PubMed ID: 1467748
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Evidence for a learning effect in short-wavelength automated perimetry.
    Wild JM, Kim LS, Pacey IE, Cunliffe IA.
    Ophthalmology; 2006 Feb; 113(2):206-15. PubMed ID: 16458091
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Visual field testing with the new Humphrey Matrix: a comparison between the FDT N-30 and Matrix N-30-F tests.
    Brusini P, Salvetat ML, Zeppieri M, Tosoni C, Parisi L, Felletti M.
    Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2006 Jun; 84(3):351-6. PubMed ID: 16704697
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Scanning laser polarimetry using variable corneal compensation in the detection of glaucoma with localized visual field defects.
    Kook MS, Cho HS, Seong M, Choi J.
    Ophthalmology; 2005 Nov; 112(11):1970-8. PubMed ID: 16185765
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 15.