These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


130 related items for PubMed ID: 7608001

  • 1. Simulated influence of postweaning production system on performance of different biological types of cattle: III. Biological efficiency.
    Williams CB, Bennett GL, Keele JW.
    J Anim Sci; 1995 Mar; 73(3):686-98. PubMed ID: 7608001
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Simulated influence of postweaning production system on performance of different biological types of cattle: II. Carcass composition, retail product, and quality.
    Williams CB, Bennett GL, Keele JW.
    J Anim Sci; 1995 Mar; 73(3):674-85. PubMed ID: 7608000
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Postweaning growth and carcass traits in crossbred cattle from Hereford, Angus, Norwegian Red, Swedish Red and White, Friesian, and Wagyu maternal grandsires.
    Casas E, Cundiff LV.
    J Anim Sci; 2006 Feb; 84(2):305-10. PubMed ID: 16424257
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Effect of biological type of cattle on the incidence of the dark, firm, and dry condition in the longissimus muscle.
    Shackelford SD, Koohmaraie M, Wheeler TL, Cundiff LV, Dikeman ME.
    J Anim Sci; 1994 Feb; 72(2):337-43. PubMed ID: 8157518
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Breed effects, dietary energy density effects, and retained heterosis on different measures of gain efficiency in beef cattle.
    Gregory KE, Cundiff LV, Koch RM.
    J Anim Sci; 1994 May; 72(5):1138-54. PubMed ID: 8056658
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Comparison of Charolais and Limousin as terminal cross sire breeds.
    Dhuyvetter JM, Frahm RR, Marshall DM.
    J Anim Sci; 1985 Apr; 60(4):935-41. PubMed ID: 3988657
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Breed effects and retained heterosis for growth, carcass, and meat traits in advanced generations of composite populations of beef cattle.
    Gregory KE, Cundiff LV, Koch RM, Dikeman ME, Koohmaraie M.
    J Anim Sci; 1994 Apr; 72(4):833-50. PubMed ID: 8014148
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Genetic variation in fatness and fatty acid composition of crossbred cattle.
    Pitchford WS, Deland MP, Siebert BD, Malau-Aduli AE, Bottema CD.
    J Anim Sci; 2002 Nov; 80(11):2825-32. PubMed ID: 12462249
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Postweaning performance and carcass merit of F1 steers sired by Brahman and alternative subtropically adapted breeds.
    Franke DE.
    J Anim Sci; 1997 Oct; 75(10):2604-8. PubMed ID: 9331861
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.