These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


138 related items for PubMed ID: 7608451

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. [Validity of the proximal isovelocity surface area color Doppler method for calculating the valve area in patients with mitral stenosis; comparison with the two-dimensional echocardiographic method].
    Centamore G, Campione S, Leto G, Galassi AR, Coco R, Evola R, La Spina L, Milazzotto A, Palazzo G, Galassi A.
    G Ital Cardiol; 1992 Oct; 22(10):1201-10. PubMed ID: 1291415
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Proximal flow convergence method by three-dimensional color Doppler echocardiography for mitral valve area assessment in rheumatic mitral stenosis.
    de Agustin JA, Mejia H, Viliani D, Marcos-Alberca P, Gomez de Diego JJ, Nuñez-Gil IJ, Almeria C, Rodrigo JL, Luaces M, Garcia-Fernandez MA, Macaya C, Perez de Isla L.
    J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2014 Aug; 27(8):838-45. PubMed ID: 24909790
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Clinical applicability for the assessment of the valvular mitral stenosis severity with Doppler echocardiography and the proximal isovelocity surface area (PISA) method.
    Lee TY, Tseng CJ, Chiao CD, Chiou CW, Mar GY, Liu CP, Lin SL, Chiang HT.
    Echocardiography; 2004 Jan; 21(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 14717713
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Calculation of mitral valve area in mitral stenosis using the proximal isovelocity surface area method. Comparison with two-dimensional planimetry and Doppler pressure half time method.
    Oku K, Utsunomiya T, Mori H, Yamachika S, Yano K.
    Jpn Heart J; 1997 Nov; 38(6):811-9. PubMed ID: 9486934
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Clinical application in routine practice of the proximal flow convergence method to calculate the mitral surface area in mitral valve stenosis.
    Bennis A, Drighil A, Tribouilloy C, Drighil A, Chraibi N.
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2002 Dec; 18(6):443-51. PubMed ID: 12537413
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Comparison of mitral valve area by pressure half-time and proximal isovelocity surface area method in patients with mitral stenosis: effect of net atrioventricular compliance.
    Salem Omar AM, Tanaka H, AbdelDayem TK, Sadek AS, Raslaan H, Al-Sherbiny A, Yamawaki K, Ryo K, Fukuda Y, Norisada K, Tatsumi K, Onishi T, Matsumoto K, Kawai H, Hirata K.
    Eur J Echocardiogr; 2011 Apr; 12(4):283-90. PubMed ID: 21266379
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Evaluation of mitral valve area by the proximal isovelocity surface area method in mitral stenosis: could it be simplified?
    Messika-Zeitoun D, Cachier A, Brochet E, Cormier B, Iung B, Vahanian A.
    Eur J Echocardiogr; 2007 Mar; 8(2):116-21. PubMed ID: 16616646
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. A simplified proximal isovelocity surface area method for mitral valve area calculation in mitral stenosis: not requiring angle correction and calculator.
    Yiginer O, Uzun M, Yilmaz Cingozbay B, Kardesoglu E, Atalay M, Isilak Z, Uz O, Keser N, Sitki Cebeci B.
    Med Glas (Zenica); 2011 Aug; 8(2):197-202. PubMed ID: 21849939
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Echocardiographic Assessment of Mitral Stenosis Orifice Area: A Comparison of a Novel Three-Dimensional Method Versus Conventional Techniques.
    Karamnov S, Burbano-Vera N, Huang CC, Fox JA, Shernan SK.
    Anesth Analg; 2017 Sep; 125(3):774-780. PubMed ID: 28678069
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Application of the vena contracta method for the calculation of the mitral valve area in mitral stenosis.
    Abaci A, Oguzhan A, Unal S, Kiranatli B, Eryol NK, Basar E, Ergin A, Cetin S.
    Cardiology; 2002 Sep; 98(1-2):50-9. PubMed ID: 12373048
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Direct measurement of proximal isovelocity surface area by single-beat three-dimensional color Doppler echocardiography in mitral regurgitation: a validation study.
    de Agustín JA, Marcos-Alberca P, Fernandez-Golfin C, Gonçalves A, Feltes G, Nuñez-Gil IJ, Almeria C, Rodrigo JL, Perez de Isla L, Macaya C, Zamorano J.
    J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2012 Aug; 25(8):815-23. PubMed ID: 22739217
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Comparison of hemodynamic pressure half-time method and Gorlin formula with Doppler and echocardiographic determinations of mitral valve area in patients with combined mitral stenosis and regurgitation.
    Fredman CS, Pearson AC, Labovitz AJ, Kern MJ.
    Am Heart J; 1990 Jan; 119(1):121-9. PubMed ID: 2404383
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Methodological variation and agreement in assessing mitral valve orifice area by echo-Doppler methods in mitral stenosis.
    Mohan JC, Chawla R, Arora R.
    Indian Heart J; 1996 Jan; 48(6):653-7. PubMed ID: 9062012
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.