These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

114 related items for PubMed ID: 7610028

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Film-based chest radiography: AMBER vs asymmetric screen-film systems.
    Chotas HG, Floyd CE, Ravin CE.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Oct; 161(4):743-7. PubMed ID: 8372749
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. [The determination of the surface and organ doses in the AMBER system. Advanced Multiple Beam Equalization Radiography].
    Herzog R, von Boetticher H, Luska G.
    Rofo; 1993 May; 158(5):483-6. PubMed ID: 8490159
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. A ROC study of AMBER and conventional chest imaging in the detection of simulated interstitial lung disease.
    van Schelven IH, Winter LH, Chakraborty DP, Schultze Kool LJ.
    Eur J Radiol; 1995 Nov; 21(1):67-71. PubMed ID: 8654463
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Effects of reduced exposure on computed radiography: comparison of nodule detection accuracy with conventional and asymmetric screen-film radiographs of a chest phantom.
    Kimme-Smith C, Aberle DR, Sayre JW, Hart EM, Greaves SM, Brown K, Young DA, Deseran MD, Johnson T, Johnson SL.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Aug; 165(2):269-73. PubMed ID: 7618538
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. [The value of the AMBER system in demonstrating intrathoracic space-occupying lesions. A comparative ROC study of the AMBER and conventional technics for postero-anterior views of the thorax. Advanced Multiple Beam Equalization Radiography].
    Bitzer M, Strayle M, Schäfer C, Walter E, Brambs HJ, Claussen CD.
    Rofo; 1993 Nov; 159(5):433-8. PubMed ID: 8219136
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. [Physics homogenization and the choice of screen-film combination in conventional thoracic radiography].
    Roversi R, Castaldini L, Guidarelli G.
    Radiol Med; 1993 Dec; 86(6):885-92. PubMed ID: 8296012
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Fundamental and clinical evaluation of chest computed tomography imaging in detectability of pulmonary nodule.
    Milla N, Ito K, Ikeda M, Nakamura K, Hirose M, Ishigaki T.
    Nagoya J Med Sci; 1994 Dec; 57(3-4):127-32. PubMed ID: 7898568
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. [Detection of simulated lung nodules evaluated with various film/screen systems].
    Li-Feng.
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1997 Feb; 57(3):104-9. PubMed ID: 9077091
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Evaluation of an asymmetric screen-film system for chest radiography.
    Morishita J, MacMahon H, Doi K, Carlin M, Sukenobu Y.
    Med Phys; 1994 Nov; 21(11):1769-75. PubMed ID: 7891639
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Detection of simulated chest lesions: comparison of a conventional screen-film combination, an asymmetric screen-film system, and storage phosphor radiography.
    Leppert AG, Prokop M, Schaefer-Prokop CM, Galanski M.
    Radiology; 1995 Apr; 195(1):259-63. PubMed ID: 7892482
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Advanced multiple beam equalization radiography (AMBER) in the detection of diffuse lung disease.
    Hansell DM, Coleman R, du Bois RM, Carr DH, Goodman LR, Kerr IH, Pearson MC, Rubens MB.
    Clin Radiol; 1991 Oct; 44(4):227-31. PubMed ID: 1959297
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Small object contrast in AMBER and conventional chest radiography.
    Chotas HG, Van Metter RL, Johnson GA, Ravin CE.
    Radiology; 1991 Sep; 180(3):853-9. PubMed ID: 1871306
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Digital radiography: comparison of different methods for imaging of the thorax and the gastrointestinal tracts.
    Busch HP.
    J Digit Imaging; 1995 Feb; 8(1 Suppl 1):8-10. PubMed ID: 7734546
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 6.