These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

235 related items for PubMed ID: 7629567

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Efficacy of screening MR angiography and Doppler ultrasonography in the evaluation of carotid artery stenosis.
    White JE, Russell WL, Greer MS, Whittle MT.
    Am Surg; 1994 May; 60(5):340-8. PubMed ID: 8161084
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Imaging of carotid arteries in symptomatic patients: cost-effectiveness of diagnostic strategies.
    Buskens E, Nederkoorn PJ, Buijs-Van Der Woude T, Mali WP, Kappelle LJ, Eikelboom BC, Van Der Graaf Y, Hunink MG.
    Radiology; 2004 Oct; 233(1):101-12. PubMed ID: 15333770
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Duplex ultrasound and magnetic resonance angiography compared with digital subtraction angiography in carotid artery stenosis: a systematic review.
    Nederkoorn PJ, van der Graaf Y, Hunink MG.
    Stroke; 2003 May; 34(5):1324-32. PubMed ID: 12690221
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Carotid duplex scan versus angiography in evaluation of carotid artery disease.
    Fontenelle LJ, Simper SC, Hanson TL.
    Am Surg; 1994 Nov; 60(11):864-8. PubMed ID: 7978683
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. [Assessment of extracranial internal carotid artery stenosis by duplex scanning magnetic resonance angiography and digital subtraction angiography: a comparative study].
    Guo D, Wang Y, Fu W.
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2000 Feb; 80(2):98-100. PubMed ID: 11798743
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Carotid artery stenosis: contrast-enhanced MR angiography with two different scan times compared with digital subtraction angiography.
    Sundgren PC, Sundén P, Lindgren A, Lanke J, Holtås S, Larsson EM.
    Neuroradiology; 2002 Jul; 44(7):592-9. PubMed ID: 12136361
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Magnetic resonance angiography is an accurate imaging adjunct to duplex ultrasound scan in patient selection for carotid endarterectomy.
    Back MR, Wilson JS, Rushing G, Stordahl N, Linden C, Johnson BL, Bandyk DF.
    J Vasc Surg; 2000 Sep; 32(3):429-38; discussion 439-40. PubMed ID: 10957649
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Detection of internal carotid artery stenosis. Comparison of 2D-MR angiography, duplex scanning, and arteriography.
    Spartera C, Morettini G, Marino G, Marsili L, Di Cesare E, La Barbera G, Petrassi C, Ventura M.
    J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino); 1993 Jun; 34(3):209-13. PubMed ID: 8344970
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Diagnostic accuracy of colour Doppler ultrasonography, CT angiography and blood-pool-enhanced MR angiography in assessing carotid stenosis: a comparative study with DSA in 170 patients.
    Anzidei M, Napoli A, Zaccagna F, Di Paolo P, Saba L, Cavallo Marincola B, Zini C, Cartocci G, Di Mare L, Catalano C, Passariello R.
    Radiol Med; 2012 Feb; 117(1):54-71. PubMed ID: 21424318
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Perioperative imaging strategies for carotid endarterectomy. An analysis of morbidity and cost-effectiveness in symptomatic patients.
    Kent KC, Kuntz KM, Patel MR, Kim D, Klufas RA, Whittemore AD, Polak JF, Skillman JJ, Edelman RR.
    JAMA; 1995 Sep 20; 274(11):888-93. PubMed ID: 7674503
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Preoperative diagnosis of carotid artery stenosis: accuracy of noninvasive testing.
    Nederkoorn PJ, Mali WP, Eikelboom BC, Elgersma OE, Buskens E, Hunink MG, Kappelle LJ, Buijs PC, Wüst AF, van der Lugt A, van der Graaf Y.
    Stroke; 2002 Aug 20; 33(8):2003-8. PubMed ID: 12154253
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Comparative study of magnetic resonance angiography, digital subtraction angiography, duplex ultrasound examination with surgical and histological findings of atherosclerotic carotid bifurcation disease.
    Liberopoulos K, Kaponis A, Kokkinis K, Pagratis N, Nicolakopoulou Z, Douskou M, Stringaris K, Clonaris C, Balas P.
    Int Angiol; 1996 Jun 20; 15(2):131-7. PubMed ID: 8803637
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Assessment of CE-MRA for the rapid detection of supra-aortic vascular disease.
    Wright VL, Olan W, Dick B, Yu H, Alberts-Grill N, Latour LL, Baird AE.
    Neurology; 2005 Jul 12; 65(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 16009882
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. [Role of 0.5 T magnetic resonance and duplex ultrasonography in the imaging of stenotic and oblitertive changes in the carotid arteries].
    Hebrang A, Brinar V, Vidjak V, Grga A, Sarlija M, Sosa T, Tomac S, Drasković J.
    Lijec Vjesn; 2002 May 12; 124(5):129-33. PubMed ID: 12152411
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Comparison of intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography, magnetic resonance angiography and duplex ultrasonography for measuring carotid artery stenosis.
    Modaresi KB, Cox TC, Summers PE, Jarosz JM, Verma H, Taylor PR, Padayachee TS.
    Br J Surg; 1999 Nov 12; 86(11):1422-6. PubMed ID: 10583289
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. [MR-angiography and duplex-ultrasonography: predictive reliability for angiographically determined internal carotid artery stenosis >/= 70-99%].
    Wölfle KD, Schnur C, Pfadenhauer K, Bruijnen H, Bohndorf K, Loeprecht H.
    Zentralbl Chir; 2002 Feb 12; 127(2):81-8. PubMed ID: 11894206
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Prospective evaluation of carotid artery stenosis: elliptic centric contrast-enhanced MR angiography and spiral CT angiography compared with digital subtraction angiography.
    Alvarez-Linera J, Benito-León J, Escribano J, Campollo J, Gesto R.
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2003 May 12; 24(5):1012-9. PubMed ID: 12748115
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Magnetic resonance angiography minimizes need for arteriography after inadequate carotid duplex ultrasound scanning.
    Back MR, Rogers GA, Wilson JS, Johnson BL, Shames ML, Bandyk DF.
    J Vasc Surg; 2003 Sep 12; 38(3):422-30; discussion 431. PubMed ID: 12947246
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 12.