These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
195 related items for PubMed ID: 763009
1. Peer review in ambulatory care: use of explicit criteria and implicit judgments. Hulka BS, Romm FJ, Parkerson GR, Russell IT, Clapp NE, Johnson FS. Med Care; 1979 Mar; 17(3 Suppl):i-vi, 1-73. PubMed ID: 763009 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Physician performance in a prepaid health plan: results of the peer review program of the Health Insurance Plan of Greater New York. Deuschle JM, Alvarez B, Logsdon DN, Stahl WM, Smith H. Med Care; 1982 Feb; 20(2):127-42. PubMed ID: 7078277 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Results of the peer assessment program of the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario. McAuley RG, Henderson HW. Can Med Assoc J; 1984 Sep 15; 131(6):557-61. PubMed ID: 6478338 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Peer review in diabetes and hypertension: the relationship between care process and patient outcome. Romm FJ, Hulka BS. South Med J; 1980 May 15; 73(5):564-8. PubMed ID: 7375969 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. A chart audit peer review system in an ambulatory service. Russo RM, Gururaj VJ, Laude TA, Rajkumar SV, Ventre SA. Pediatrics; 1975 Aug 15; 56(2):246-54. PubMed ID: 1161373 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Criteria for evaluation of ambulatory child health care by chart audit: development and testing of a methodology. Final report of the Joint Committee on Quality Assurance of Ambulatory Health Care for Children and Youth. Osborne CE, Thompson HC. Pediatrics; 1975 Oct 15; 56(4 PT 2 SUPPL):625-92. PubMed ID: 1208179 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Profiling quality of care: Is there a role for peer review? Hofer TP, Asch SM, Hayward RA, Rubenstein LV, Hogan MM, Adams J, Kerr EA. BMC Health Serv Res; 2004 May 19; 4(1):9. PubMed ID: 15151701 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [Peer review in ICU]. Braun JP, Bause H. Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2012 May 19; 106(8):566-70. PubMed ID: 23084862 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Internists' perceptions and performance in office practice. Romm FJ, Hulka BS, Kelly LW. South Med J; 1980 Apr 19; 73(4):405-10, 414. PubMed ID: 7367926 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. A limitation in the use of office records for health care evaluation. Long T, Rogers KD. Pediatrics; 1975 Aug 19; 56(2):295-6. PubMed ID: 1161376 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Should there be statistical guidelines for medical research papers? Biometrics; 1978 Dec 19; 34(4):687-95. PubMed ID: 749952 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Peer review: central specialist committee statement. McKean WI. N Z Med J; 1983 Mar 23; 96(728):214-5. PubMed ID: 6572827 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Developing criteria for quality of assessment: effect of the Delphi technique. Romm FJ, Hulka BS. Health Serv Res; 1979 Mar 23; 14(4):309-12. PubMed ID: 393660 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Use of explicit criteria and implicit judgments in a drug-use review program. Gregoire JP, Tremblay J. Am J Hosp Pharm; 1987 Feb 23; 44(2):332-6. PubMed ID: 3565392 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Peer review of a small group practice. Phillips TJ, Braturde AP, Wood FC. J Fam Pract; 1974 May 23; 1(1):28-33. PubMed ID: 4452840 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The silent killer: introduction to the section on evaluation of ambulatory care of patients with hypertension. Sandrick KM. QRB Qual Rev Bull; 1977 May 23; 3(5):13-4. PubMed ID: 407521 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]