These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
495 related items for PubMed ID: 7635582
1. Hypnotic responsivity of the deaf: the development of the University of Tennessee Hypnotic Susceptibility Scale for the Deaf. Repka RJ, Nash MR. Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1995 Jul; 43(3):316-31. PubMed ID: 7635582 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparison of the hypnotic experience between signing deaf and hearing participants. Matthews WJ, Isenberg GL. Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1995 Oct; 43(4):375-85. PubMed ID: 7591339 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. A multivariate approach to the prediction of hypnotic susceptibility. Dixon M, Labelle L, Laurence JR. Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1996 Jul; 44(3):250-64. PubMed ID: 8690536 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Italian norms for the Stanford Hypnotic Susceptibility Scale, Form C. De Pascalis V, Bellusci A, Russo PM. Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 2000 Jul; 48(3):315-23. PubMed ID: 10902296 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Suggestibility or hypnosis: what do our scales really measure? Kirsch I. Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1997 Jul; 45(3):212-25. PubMed ID: 9204635 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Have the hypnotic susceptibility scales outlived their usefulness? Woody EZ. Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1997 Jul; 45(3):226-38. PubMed ID: 9204636 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The Harvard Group Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility and related instruments: individual and group administrations. Angelini FJ, Kumar VK, Chandler L. Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1999 Jul; 47(3):236-50. PubMed ID: 10616257 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Not all group hypnotic suggestibility scales are created equal: individual differences in behavioral and subjective responses. Barnes SM, Lynn SJ, Pekala RJ. Conscious Cogn; 2009 Mar; 18(1):255-65. PubMed ID: 18778955 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Expectancy versus absorption in the prediction of hypnotic responding. Council JR, Kirsch I, Hafner LP. J Pers Soc Psychol; 1986 Jan; 50(1):182-9. PubMed ID: 3701572 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Behavioral and subjective scoring of the Harvard Group Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility: further data and an extension. Kumar VK, Marcano G, Pekala RJ. Am J Clin Hypn; 1996 Jan; 38(3):191-9. PubMed ID: 8712162 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Differential patterns of spontaneous experiential response to a hypnotic induction: a latent profile analysis. Terhune DB, Cardeña E. Conscious Cogn; 2010 Dec; 19(4):1140-50. PubMed ID: 20395157 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Reading the signs: impact of signed versus written questionnaires on the prevalence of psychopathology among deaf adolescents. Cornes A, Rohan MJ, Napier J, Rey JM. Aust N Z J Psychiatry; 2006 Aug; 40(8):665-73. PubMed ID: 16866762 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]