These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

173 related items for PubMed ID: 7641170

  • 1. Preliminary time-flow study: comparison of interpretation times between PACS workstations and films.
    Kato H, Kubota G, Kojima K, Hayashi N, Nishihara E, Kura H, Aizawa M.
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 1995; 19(3):261-5. PubMed ID: 7641170
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Clinical evaluation of newly developed CRT viewing station: CT reading and observer's performance.
    Hirota H, Shimamoto K, Yamakawa K, Ishigaki T, Takahashi Y, Sugiyama N, Nishihara E, Tani Y.
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 1995; 19(3):281-5. PubMed ID: 7641172
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. A comparison of image reject rates when using film, hard copy computed radiography and soft copy images on picture archiving and communication systems (PACS) workstations.
    Weatherburn GC, Bryan S, West M.
    Br J Radiol; 1999 Jul; 72(859):653-60. PubMed ID: 10624322
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Computed tomography interpretations with a low-cost workstation: a timing study.
    Beard DV, Hemminger BM, Pisano ED, Denelsbeck KM, Warshauer DM, Mauro MA, Keefe B, McCartney WH, Wilcox CB.
    J Digit Imaging; 1994 Aug; 7(3):133-9. PubMed ID: 7948172
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Radiology report times: impact of picture archiving and communication systems.
    Bryan S, Weatherburn G, Watkins J, Roddie M, Keen J, Muris N, Buxton MJ.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 May; 170(5):1153-9. PubMed ID: 9574575
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Finding-specific display presets for computed radiography soft-copy reading.
    Andriole KP, Gould RG, Webb WR.
    J Digit Imaging; 1999 May; 12(2 Suppl 1):3-5. PubMed ID: 10342153
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Radiologists' reading times using PACS and using films: one practice's experience.
    Fleishon HB, Bhargavan M, Meghea C.
    Acad Radiol; 2006 Apr; 13(4):453-60. PubMed ID: 16554225
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Accuracy of interpretation of CT scans: comparing PACS monitor displays and hard-copy images.
    Reiner BI, Siegel EL, Hooper FJ.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Dec; 179(6):1407-10. PubMed ID: 12438025
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. PACS for multi-slice CT--seamless integration implementing 3D and 4D workstations.
    Yamamoto S, Furukawa Y, Matsumoto T, Takahashi S, Ueguchi T, Matsumoto M, Ogata Y, Tomiyama N, Komizu M, Tomoda K, Narumi Y, Johkoh T, Nakamura H.
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2004 Jun; 60(6):829-34. PubMed ID: 15220871
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Workstation scheme and implementation for a medical imaging information system.
    Tao Y, Miao J.
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2003 May; 116(5):654-7. PubMed ID: 12875671
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Anatomy of picture archiving and Communications systems: nuts and bolts--image acquisition: getting digital images from imaging modalities.
    Andriole KP.
    J Digit Imaging; 1999 May; 12(2 Suppl 1):216-7. PubMed ID: 10342220
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Comparison of computer display monitors for computed radiography diagnostic application in a radiology PACS.
    Sim L, Manthey K, Esdaile P, Benson M.
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2004 Sep; 27(3):148-50. PubMed ID: 15580844
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. PACS and CR implementation in a level I trauma center emergency department.
    Junck KL, Berland LL, Bernreuter WK, McEachern M, Grandhi S, Lewey G.
    J Digit Imaging; 1998 Aug; 11(3 Suppl 1):159-62. PubMed ID: 9735458
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Radiologists' productivity in the interpretation of CT scans: a comparison of PACS with conventional film.
    Reiner BI, Siegel EL, Hooper FJ, Pomerantz S, Dahlke A, Rallis D.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2001 Apr; 176(4):861-4. PubMed ID: 11264065
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Clinical aspects of direct digital mammography.
    Parkin GJ.
    J Digit Imaging; 1995 Feb; 8(1 Suppl 1):61-6. PubMed ID: 7734542
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Picture archiving and communication system--Part one: Filmless radiology and distance radiology.
    De Backer AI, Mortelé KJ, De Keulenaer BL.
    JBR-BTR; 2004 Feb; 87(5):234-41. PubMed ID: 15587562
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Challenges associated with the incorporation of digital radiography into a picture archival and communication system.
    Siegel EL, Reiner BI.
    J Digit Imaging; 1999 May; 12(2 Suppl 1):6-8. PubMed ID: 10342154
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. PACS in practice: the status of the PACS project at the St. Radboud University Hospital. Part A: Introduction and the picture system.
    van Erning LJ, Thijssen MA, Karssemeijer N, Guijt W.
    Med Inform (Lond); 1988 May; 13(4):255-64. PubMed ID: 3246898
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Computers in imaging and health care: now and in the future.
    Arenson RL, Andriole KP, Avrin DE, Gould RG.
    J Digit Imaging; 2000 Nov; 13(4):145-56. PubMed ID: 11110253
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Practical mini-PACS based on a hybrid video and digital network.
    Takizawa M, Sone S, Imai S, Sakai F, Imai Y, Maruyama A.
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 1991 Nov; 36(2-3):119-24. PubMed ID: 1786680
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.