These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

140 related items for PubMed ID: 7642831

  • 1. The development of frequency resolution in humans as revealed by the auditory brain-stem response recorded with notched-noise masking.
    Abdala C, Folsom RC.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Aug; 98(2 Pt 1):921-30. PubMed ID: 7642831
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Frequency contribution to the click-evoked auditory brain-stem response in human adults and infants.
    Abdala C, Folsom RC.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Apr; 97(4):2394-404. PubMed ID: 7714257
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Frequency specificity of the human auditory brainstem and middle latency responses using notched noise masking.
    Oates PA, Purdy SC.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Aug; 110(2):995-1009. PubMed ID: 11519624
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. The intensitive DL of tones: dependence of signal/masker ratio on tone level and on spectrum of added noise.
    Greenwood DD.
    Hear Res; 1993 Feb; 65(1-2):1-39. PubMed ID: 8458743
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. [Frequency specificity of ABR evaluated by tuning curves].
    Horiuchi Y.
    Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho; 1989 Nov; 92(11):1895-910. PubMed ID: 2593037
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Auditory brain stem responses from human adults and infants: restriction of frequency contribution by notched-noise masking.
    Folsom RC, Wynne MK.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 Oct; 80(4):1057-64. PubMed ID: 3771926
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Frequency tuning curves derived from auditory steady state evoked potentials: a proof-of-concept study.
    Markessis E, Poncelet L, Colin C, Coppens A, Hoonhorst I, Kadhim H, Deltenre P.
    Ear Hear; 2009 Feb; 30(1):43-53. PubMed ID: 19125026
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Frequency specificity of chirp-evoked auditory brainstem responses.
    Wegner O, Dau T.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Mar; 111(3):1318-29. PubMed ID: 11931309
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Offset tuning curves generated by simultaneous masking are more finely tuned than those generated by forward masking.
    Henry KR.
    Hear Res; 1986 Mar; 24(2):151-61. PubMed ID: 3771377
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Tuning of the auditory brainstem OFF responses is complementary to tuning of the auditory brainstem ON response.
    Henry KR.
    Hear Res; 1985 Mar; 19(2):115-25. PubMed ID: 4055531
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. [A comparison of low-chirp- and notched-noise-evoked auditory brainstem response].
    Mühlenberg L, Schade G.
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2012 Aug; 91(8):500-4. PubMed ID: 22135225
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Auditory brain stem responses from human adults and infants: wave V tuning curves.
    Folsom RC, Wynne MK.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1987 Feb; 81(2):412-7. PubMed ID: 3558957
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Frequency specificity of the human auditory brainstem and middle latency responses to brief tones. II. Derived response analyses.
    Oates P, Stapells DR.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1997 Dec; 102(6):3609-19. PubMed ID: 9407654
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Auditory filter nonlinearity across frequency using simultaneous notched-noise masking.
    Baker RJ, Rosen S.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Jan; 119(1):454-62. PubMed ID: 16454300
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Measures of auditory brain-stem responses, distortion product otoacoustic emissions, hair cell loss, and forward masked tuning curves in the waltzing guinea pig.
    Canlon B, Marklund K, Borg E.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Dec; 94(6):3232-43. PubMed ID: 8300958
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Auditory filter shapes at high frequencies.
    Zhou B.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Oct; 98(4):1935-42. PubMed ID: 7593917
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. A comparison of AP and ABR tuning curves in the guinea pig.
    Brown CJ, Abbas PJ.
    Hear Res; 1987 Oct; 25(2-3):193-204. PubMed ID: 3558128
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. A release from masking by continuous, random, notched noise.
    Carlyon RP.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1987 Feb; 81(2):418-26. PubMed ID: 3558958
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Effects of signal delay on auditory filter shapes derived from psychophysical tuning curves and notched-noise data obtained in simultaneous masking.
    Bacon SP, Repovsch-Duffey JL, Liu L.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Jul; 112(1):227-37. PubMed ID: 12141348
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Rapid measurement of auditory filter shape in mice using the auditory brainstem response and notched noise.
    Lina IA, Lauer AM.
    Hear Res; 2013 Apr; 298():73-9. PubMed ID: 23347916
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.