These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

170 related items for PubMed ID: 7646163

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Randomized, prospective assessment of bioprosthetic valve durability. Hancock versus Carpentier-Edwards valves.
    Sarris GE, Robbins RC, Miller DC, Mitchell RS, Moore KA, Stinson EB, Oyer PE, Reitz BA, Shumway NE.
    Circulation; 1993 Nov; 88(5 Pt 2):II55-64. PubMed ID: 8222197
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Twenty-year durability of the aortic Hancock II bioprosthesis in young patients: is it durable enough?
    Une D, Ruel M, David TE.
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2014 Nov; 46(5):825-30. PubMed ID: 24510909
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Twenty-year clinical experience with porcine bioprostheses.
    Fann JI, Miller DC, Moore KA, Mitchell RS, Oyer PE, Stinson EB, Robbins RC, Reitz BA, Shumway NE.
    Ann Thorac Surg; 1996 Nov; 62(5):1301-11; discussion 1311-2. PubMed ID: 8893561
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Hancock II porcine bioprosthesis: excellent durability at intermediate-term follow-up.
    Bortolotti U, Milano A, Mazzaro E, Thiene G, Talenti E, Casarotto D.
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1994 Sep; 24(3):676-82. PubMed ID: 8077538
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Durability after aortic valve replacement with the Mitroflow versus the Perimount pericardial bioprosthesis: a single-centre experience in 2393 patients.
    Nielsen PH, Hjortdal V, Modrau IS, Jensen H, Kimose HH, Terp K, Poulsen SH, Smerup M, Nielsen SL.
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2016 Jun; 49(6):1705-10. PubMed ID: 26984983
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Porcine valves: Hancock and Carpentier-Edwards aortic prostheses.
    Fann JI, Miller DC.
    Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1996 Jul; 8(3):259-68. PubMed ID: 8843517
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Morphologic findings in explanted Hancock II porcine bioprostheses.
    Butany J, Yu W, Silver MD, David TE.
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1999 Jan; 8(1):4-15. PubMed ID: 10096476
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Long-term durability of the Hancock porcine bioprosthesis following combined mitral and aortic valve replacement: an 11-year experience.
    Bortolotti U, Milano A, Thiene G, Guerra F, Mazzucco A, Talenti E, Gallucci V.
    Ann Thorac Surg; 1987 Aug; 44(2):139-44. PubMed ID: 3619538
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Durability of the Carpentier-Edwards porcine bioprosthesis: role of age and valve position.
    Bernal JM, Rabasa JM, Lopez R, Nistal JF, Muñiz R, Revuelta JM.
    Ann Thorac Surg; 1995 Aug; 60(2 Suppl):S248-52. PubMed ID: 7646167
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Comparative study of primary tissue failure between porcine (Hancock and Carpentier-Edwards) and bovine pericardial (Ionescu-Shiley) bioprostheses in the aortic position at five- to nine-year follow-up.
    Gallo I, Nistal F, Arbe E, Artiñano E.
    Am J Cardiol; 1988 Apr 01; 61(10):812-6. PubMed ID: 3354445
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.