These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

166 related items for PubMed ID: 7652012

  • 41.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 42. Computer-aided diagnosis: automatic detection of malignant masses in digitized mammograms.
    Méndez AJ, Tahoces PG, Lado MJ, Souto M, Vidal JJ.
    Med Phys; 1998 Jun; 25(6):957-64. PubMed ID: 9650186
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 43.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 44.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 45.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 46.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 47. Automated computerized classification of malignant and benign masses on digitized mammograms.
    Huo Z, Giger ML, Vyborny CJ, Wolverton DE, Schmidt RA, Doi K.
    Acad Radiol; 1998 Mar; 5(3):155-68. PubMed ID: 9522881
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 48. Computer-assisted detection of mammographic masses: a template matching scheme based on mutual information.
    Tourassi GD, Vargas-Voracek R, Catarious DM, Floyd CE.
    Med Phys; 2003 Aug; 30(8):2123-30. PubMed ID: 12945977
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 49.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 50. Computerized analysis of multiple-mammographic views: potential usefulness of special view mammograms in computer-aided diagnosis.
    Huo Z, Giger ML, Vyborny CJ.
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2001 Dec; 20(12):1285-92. PubMed ID: 11811828
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 51. The use of texture analysis to delineate suspicious masses in mammography.
    Gupta R, Undrill PE.
    Phys Med Biol; 1995 May; 40(5):835-55. PubMed ID: 7652011
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 52. Comparative analysis of breast cancer detection in mammograms and thermograms.
    Milosevic M, Jankovic D, Peulic A.
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 2015 Feb; 60(1):49-56. PubMed ID: 25720034
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 53. Classification of malignant and benign masses based on hybrid ART2LDA approach.
    Hadjiiski L, Sahiner B, Chan HP, Petrick N, Helvie M.
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 1999 Dec; 18(12):1178-87. PubMed ID: 10695530
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 54. Computer-aided detection of architectural distortion in prior mammograms of interval cancer.
    Rangayyan RM, Banik S, Desautels JE.
    J Digit Imaging; 2010 Oct; 23(5):611-31. PubMed ID: 20127270
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 55.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 56. Use of border information in the classification of mammographic masses.
    Varela C, Timp S, Karssemeijer N.
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Jan 21; 51(2):425-41. PubMed ID: 16394348
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 57.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 58. Multi-scaled morphological features for the characterization of mammographic masses using statistical classification schemes.
    Georgiou H, Mavroforakis M, Dimitropoulos N, Cavouras D, Theodoridis S.
    Artif Intell Med; 2007 Sep 21; 41(1):39-55. PubMed ID: 17714924
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 59.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 60.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.