These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

149 related items for PubMed ID: 7658389

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Effect of disinfection of custom tray materials on adhesive properties of several impression material systems.
    Thompson GA, Vermilyea SG, Agar JR.
    J Prosthet Dent; 1994 Dec; 72(6):651-6. PubMed ID: 7853264
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Adhesive properties of several impression material systems: Part II.
    Chai JY, Jameson LM, Moser JB, Hesby RA.
    J Prosthet Dent; 1991 Sep; 66(3):287-92. PubMed ID: 1800721
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Properties of the tray adhesive of an addition polymerizing silicone to impression tray materials.
    Sulong MZ, Setchell DJ.
    J Prosthet Dent; 1991 Dec; 66(6):743-7. PubMed ID: 1805022
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Bond strength of three nonaqueous elastomeric impression materials to a light-activated resin tray.
    Payne JA, Pereira BP.
    Int J Prosthodont; 1992 Dec; 5(1):55-8. PubMed ID: 1520444
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Factors that affect the adhesion of two irreversible hydrocolloid materials to two custom tray materials.
    Smith SJ, McCord JF, Macfarlane TV.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Oct; 88(4):423-30. PubMed ID: 12447220
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. The effect of custom tray material type and fabrication technique on tensile bond strength of impression material adhesive systems.
    Abdullah MA, Talic YF.
    J Oral Rehabil; 2003 Mar; 30(3):312-7. PubMed ID: 12588506
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Effect of reactive adhesives on the tensile bond strength of polyvinyl siloxane impression materials to methyl methacrylate tray material.
    Ona M, Takahashi H, Sato M, Igarashi Y, Wakabayashi N.
    Dent Mater J; 2010 May; 29(3):336-40. PubMed ID: 20484844
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. The effect of tray material and surface condition on the shear bond strength of impression materials.
    Wang RR, Nguyen T, Boyle AM.
    J Prosthet Dent; 1995 Nov; 74(5):449-54. PubMed ID: 8809248
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Influence of tray rigidity and impression technique on accuracy of polyvinyl siloxane impressions.
    Hoyos A, Soderholm KJ.
    Int J Prosthodont; 2011 Nov; 24(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 21210004
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Effect of impression tray design and impression technique upon the accuracy of stone casts produced from a putty-wash polyvinyl siloxane impression material.
    Saunders WP, Sharkey SW, Smith GM, Taylor WG.
    J Dent; 1991 Oct; 19(5):283-9. PubMed ID: 1806594
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.