These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

149 related items for PubMed ID: 7658389

  • 21. Polyvinyl siloxane impression materials: a review of properties and techniques.
    Chee WW, Donovan TE.
    J Prosthet Dent; 1992 Nov; 68(5):728-32. PubMed ID: 1432791
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Determining the accuracy of stock and custom tray impression/casts.
    Millstein P, Maya A, Segura C.
    J Oral Rehabil; 1998 Aug; 25(8):645-8. PubMed ID: 9781870
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Comparison of Tensile Bond Strength of Addition Silicone with Different Custom Tray Materials Using Different Retentive Methods.
    Patil RV, Vijayraghavan V, Jadhav M, Jajoo S, Desai S, Jagtap C.
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2021 Mar 01; 22(3):278-283. PubMed ID: 34210929
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Use of polyvinyl siloxane material for an altered cast impression tray.
    Hsu YT.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Sep 01; 112(3):695-6. PubMed ID: 24657176
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Effects of chemical disinfectant solutions on the stability and accuracy of the dental impression complex.
    Rios MP, Morgano SM, Stein RS, Rose L.
    J Prosthet Dent; 1996 Oct 01; 76(4):356-62. PubMed ID: 8897290
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Peel bond strengths of five impression material tray adhesives.
    MacSween R, Price RB.
    J Can Dent Assoc; 1991 Aug 01; 57(8):654-7. PubMed ID: 1889016
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Tensile and peel bond strengths of tray adhesives.
    Grant BE, Tjan AH.
    J Prosthet Dent; 1988 Feb 01; 59(2):165-8. PubMed ID: 3278100
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Tensile bond strength between custom tray and elastomeric impression material.
    Maruo Y, Nishigawa G, Oka M, Minagi S, Irie M, Suzuki K.
    Dent Mater J; 2007 May 01; 26(3):323-8. PubMed ID: 17694739
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. An alternative method of fabricating a custom tray for direct implant impressions.
    Cura C, Isik FG, Dundar M.
    Gen Dent; 2011 May 01; 59(1):e22-4. PubMed ID: 21613027
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Evaluation of the Bond Strength of Universal Tray Adhesives on Silicone Impression Materials Using an Acrylic Tray.
    Kambiranda SC, Pinto B, Elpatal MA, Sam G, Chaitra AS, Rani RP.
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2019 Dec 01; 20(12):1406-1411. PubMed ID: 32381841
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.