These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

110 related items for PubMed ID: 7667929

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. The time course of pattern discrimination in the human brain.
    Harauzov AK, Shelepin YE, Noskov YA, Vasilev PP, Foreman NP.
    Vision Res; 2016 Aug; 125():55-63. PubMed ID: 27291935
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Attentional capture is contingent on the interaction between task demand and stimulus salience.
    Lu S, Han S.
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Jul; 71(5):1015-26. PubMed ID: 19525534
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Trial history effects in the ventral attentional network.
    Scalf PE, Ahn J, Beck DM, Lleras A.
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2014 Dec; 26(12):2789-97. PubMed ID: 24960047
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Distractor P3 is associated with attentional capture by stimulus deviance.
    Sawaki R, Katayama J.
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2008 Jun; 119(6):1300-9. PubMed ID: 18411071
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Configuration-specific attentional modulation of flanker- -target lateral interactions.
    Freeman E, Sagi D, Driver J.
    Perception; 2004 Jun; 33(2):181-94. PubMed ID: 15109161
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Difficulty of discrimination modulates attentional capture by regulating attentional focus.
    Sawaki R, Katayama J.
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Feb; 21(2):359-71. PubMed ID: 18510441
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. The effect of visual task difficulty and attentional direction on the detection of acoustic change as indexed by the Mismatch Negativity.
    Muller-Gass A, Stelmack RM, Campbell KB.
    Brain Res; 2006 Mar 17; 1078(1):112-30. PubMed ID: 16497283
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Feature-specific effects of selective visual attention.
    Rossi AF, Paradiso MA.
    Vision Res; 1995 Mar 17; 35(5):621-34. PubMed ID: 7900301
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Meridional anisotropies of orientation discrimination for sine wave gratings.
    Heeley DW, Timney B.
    Vision Res; 1988 Mar 17; 28(2):337-44. PubMed ID: 3414021
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Prestimulus oscillations in the alpha band of the EEG are modulated by the difficulty of feature discrimination and predict activation of a sensory discrimination process.
    Roberts DM, Fedota JR, Buzzell GA, Parasuraman R, McDonald CG.
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2014 Aug 17; 26(8):1615-28. PubMed ID: 24405187
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. The effect of short-term training on cardinal and oblique orientation discrimination: an ERP study.
    Song Y, Sun L, Wang Y, Zhang X, Kang J, Ma X, Yang B, Guan Y, Ding Y.
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2010 Mar 17; 75(3):241-8. PubMed ID: 19995581
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 6.