These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

103 related items for PubMed ID: 7668631

  • 1. Comparison of a promontory stimulation test using a transtympanic needle electrode with a test using an ear canal electrode.
    Khan S, Raine CH, Becconsall K.
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():190-2. PubMed ID: 7668631
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. [Experience with electrostimulation of the acoustic nerve before cochlea implantation].
    Hoth S, Lenarz T.
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1991 Apr; 70(4):199-207. PubMed ID: 2054026
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Comparison of preoperative electrostimulation data using an ear-canal electrode and a promontory needle electrode.
    Lesinski A, Littmann X, Battmer RD, Lenarz T.
    Am J Otol; 1997 Nov; 18(6 Suppl):S88-9. PubMed ID: 9391612
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. [Paired pulse discrimination test for evaluating auditory nerve function in deaf patients with cochlear prostheses].
    Yun JT, Chang Y, Wang ZZ.
    Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao; 1986 Aug; 8(4):282-5. PubMed ID: 2953476
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. The cochlear prosthesis: a review of the design and evaluation of electrode implants for the profoundly deaf.
    Spelman FA.
    Crit Rev Biomed Eng; 1982 Aug; 8(3):223-52. PubMed ID: 6754255
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Preoperative assessment of function of the auditory nerve using electroaudiometry and a notched-noise auditory brain stem response technique.
    Wagner H, Gerhardt HJ, Stürzebecher E, Werbs M.
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():198-201. PubMed ID: 7668635
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. [Preliminary studies of deaf patients assessed for cochlear implantation].
    Schorn K, Seifert J, Stecker M, Zollner M.
    Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg); 1986 Mar; 65(3):114-7. PubMed ID: 3012229
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. [Loudness scaling in cochlear implant patients within the scope of preoperative evaluation].
    Müller J, Schön F.
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1994 Mar; 73(3):128-31. PubMed ID: 8172631
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. [Experiences with the implantation of a multichannel electrode in the acoustic nerve].
    Naumann HH, Zwicker E, Scherer H, Seifert J, Leysieffer H, Zollner M.
    Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg); 1986 Mar; 65(3):118-22. PubMed ID: 3754920
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. [Electrical stimulation of the middle ear in total deafness: results in 375 cases (author's transl)].
    Chouard CH, Fugain C, Donnadieu G, Josset P, Lengrand D.
    Ann Otolaryngol Chir Cervicofac; 1982 Mar; 99(1-2):15-22. PubMed ID: 6896616
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Noninvasive extratympanic electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve.
    Liard P, Pelizzone M, Rohr A, Montandon P.
    ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 1988 Mar; 50(3):156-61. PubMed ID: 3405596
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Predictive factors in cochlear implants.
    Albu S, Babighian G.
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg; 1997 Mar; 51(1):11-6. PubMed ID: 9105476
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Fusion and lateralization study with two binaural cochlear implant patients.
    Van Hoesel RJ, Clark GM.
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():233-5. PubMed ID: 7668650
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. [Status of the development of cochlear prostheses relying on electric stimulation].
    Hochmair-Desoyer IJ.
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 1989 Sep; 34(7-8):168-76. PubMed ID: 2775823
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Preoperative electrical stimulation for cochlear implant selection. The use of ear canal electrodes versus transtympanic electrodes.
    Spies TH, Snik AF, Mens LH, van den Broek P.
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1993 Sep; 113(5):579-84. PubMed ID: 8266782
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Auditory brainstem activity and development evoked by apical versus basal cochlear implant electrode stimulation in children.
    Gordon KA, Papsin BC, Harrison RV.
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Aug; 118(8):1671-84. PubMed ID: 17588811
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. [Brain stem potentials evoked by electric stimulation of the auditory nerve].
    Robier A, Le Scao Y.
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg; 1991 Aug; 45(2):253-6. PubMed ID: 2063671
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Auditory neural prostheses.
    Aran JM.
    Int J Neurosci; 1983 May; 19(1-4):59-64. PubMed ID: 6603441
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Electrical promontory testing in differential diagnosis of sensori-neural hearing impairment.
    House WF, Brackmann DE.
    Laryngoscope; 1974 Dec; 84(12):2163-71. PubMed ID: 4373629
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Electrical promontory stimulation test using a portable peripheral nerve stimulator with an ear canal electrode.
    Kurasawa M, Nakamura T, Ganaha A, Nakashima T, Tono T.
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2024 Feb; 51(1):76-81. PubMed ID: 37193621
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 6.