These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

100 related items for PubMed ID: 7668633

  • 1. Prognostic indicators of speech recognition performance in adult cochlear implant users: a prospective analysis.
    Shipp DB, Nedzelski JM.
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():194-6. PubMed ID: 7668633
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Prognostic value of round-window psychophysical testing with cochlear-implant candidates.
    Shipp DB, Nedzelski JM.
    J Otolaryngol; 1994 Jun; 23(3):172-6. PubMed ID: 8064955
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Performance of prelingually or postlingually deafened adults who were using a single or multichannel cochlear implant.
    Hinderink JB, Snik AF, Mens LH, Brokx JP, van den Broek P.
    Ear Nose Throat J; 1994 Mar; 73(3):180-3. PubMed ID: 8205980
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. [Rate discrimination and tone recognition in mandarin-speaking cochlear-implant listeners].
    Wei C, Cao K, Wang Z.
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 1999 Apr; 34(2):84-8. PubMed ID: 12764854
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Performance of prelingually and postlingually deaf patients using single-channel or multichannel cochlear implants.
    Hinderink JB, Mens LH, Brokx JP, van den Broek P.
    Laryngoscope; 1995 Jun; 105(6):618-22. PubMed ID: 7769946
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Results with the currently used cochlear implant.
    Ito J, Takagi A, Kawano M, Takahashi H, Honjo I.
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():298-300. PubMed ID: 7668678
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Performance of older adult cochlear implant users in Hong Kong.
    Chan V, Tong M, Yue V, Wong T, Leung E, Yuen K, van Hasselt A.
    Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2 Suppl):52S-55S. PubMed ID: 17496647
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Surgical treatment and rehabilitation of prelingually and perilingually deafened children and adults with the nucleus multichannel cochlear implant.
    García JM, Barón de Otero C, García J, Peñaranda A, Niño C, Campos S.
    Ear Nose Throat J; 1994 Mar; 73(3):169-75. PubMed ID: 8205978
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Value of the promontory stimulation test in predicting speech perception after cochlear implantation.
    Lee JC, Yoo MH, Ahn JH, Lee KS.
    Laryngoscope; 2007 Nov; 117(11):1988-92. PubMed ID: 17767084
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Recognition of simulated telephone speech by cochlear implant users.
    Fu QJ, Galvin JJ.
    Am J Audiol; 2006 Dec; 15(2):127-32. PubMed ID: 17182877
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. [Changes of the late acoustically evoked potentials in postlingually deaf patients with cochlear implants].
    Schmidt R, Kaftan H, Hosemann W, Gräbel S.
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2005 Mar; 84(3):182-6. PubMed ID: 15770566
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Auditory cortical activation and speech perception in cochlear implant users: effects of implant experience and duration of deafness.
    Green KM, Julyan PJ, Hastings DL, Ramsden RT.
    Hear Res; 2005 Jul; 205(1-2):184-92. PubMed ID: 15953527
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Intelligibility of the Patient's Speech Predicts the Likelihood of Cochlear Implant Success in Prelingually Deaf Adults.
    van Dijkhuizen JN, Boermans PP, Briaire JJ, Frijns JH.
    Ear Hear; 2016 Jul; 37(5):e302-10. PubMed ID: 26928004
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Predictive factors for success with a cochlear implant.
    van Dijk JE, van Olphen AF, Mens LH, Brokx JP, van den Broek P, Smoorenburg GF.
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():196-8. PubMed ID: 7668634
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Electrophysiological and speech perception measures of auditory processing in experienced adult cochlear implant users.
    Kelly AS, Purdy SC, Thorne PR.
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2005 Jun; 116(6):1235-46. PubMed ID: 15978485
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Hearing results with deep insertion of cochlear implant electrodes.
    Hodges AV, Villasuso E, Balkany T, Bird PA, Butts S, Lee D, Gomez O.
    Am J Otol; 1999 Jan; 20(1):53-5. PubMed ID: 9918173
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. The benefits of remote microphone technology for adults with cochlear implants.
    Fitzpatrick EM, Séguin C, Schramm DR, Armstrong S, Chénier J.
    Ear Hear; 2009 Oct; 30(5):590-9. PubMed ID: 19561509
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Blink reflex and auditory speech perception in prelingually cochlear-implanted children.
    Emamdjomeh H, Shafaghat L, Abbassalipour P, Hassanzadeh S, Alaeddini F, Farhadi M, Daneshi A.
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Apr; 125(4):358-62. PubMed ID: 15823805
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Cochlear implantation outcome in prelingually deafened young adults. A speech perception study.
    Santarelli R, De Filippi R, Genovese E, Arslan E.
    Audiol Neurootol; 2008 Apr; 13(4):257-65. PubMed ID: 18259078
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 5.