These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

100 related items for PubMed ID: 7668633

  • 21. Performance changes in University College Hospital/Royal National Institute for the Deaf single-channel cochlear implant users upgraded to the Nucleus 22-channel cochlear implant system.
    Eyles JA, Aleksy WL, Boyle PJ.
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():263-5. PubMed ID: 7668662
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. [Speech discrimination in post-lingually deaf patients with cochlear implants].
    Gstoettner W, Adunka O, Hamzavi J, Lautischer M, Baumgartner WD.
    Wien Klin Wochenschr; 2000 Jun 02; 112(11):487-91. PubMed ID: 10890126
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Spectral and temporal cues in cochlear implant speech perception.
    Nie K, Barco A, Zeng FG.
    Ear Hear; 2006 Apr 02; 27(2):208-17. PubMed ID: 16518146
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Advantages of binaural hearing provided through bimodal stimulation via a cochlear implant and a conventional hearing aid: a 6-month comparative study.
    Morera C, Manrique M, Ramos A, Garcia-Ibanez L, Cavalle L, Huarte A, Castillo C, Estrada E.
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jun 02; 125(6):596-606. PubMed ID: 16076708
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. [Test of electrical stimulation of the round window. Diagnostic and prognostic value of the rehabilitation of total deafness by cochlear implant].
    Chouard CH, Koca E, Meyer B, Jacquier I.
    Ann Otolaryngol Chir Cervicofac; 1994 Jun 02; 111(2):75-84. PubMed ID: 7825941
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Clinical relevance of quality of life outcome in cochlear implantation in postlingually deafened adults.
    Klop WM, Boermans PP, Ferrier MB, van den Hout WB, Stiggelbout AM, Frijns JH.
    Otol Neurotol; 2008 Aug 02; 29(5):615-21. PubMed ID: 18451751
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Subjective and objective results after bilateral cochlear implantation in adults.
    Laske RD, Veraguth D, Dillier N, Binkert A, Holzmann D, Huber AM.
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Apr 02; 30(3):313-8. PubMed ID: 19318885
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Use of S-shaped input-output functions for noise suppression in cochlear implants.
    Kasturi K, Loizou PC.
    Ear Hear; 2007 Jun 02; 28(3):402-11. PubMed ID: 17485989
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Is psychological status a determinant of speech perception outcomes in highly selected good adolescent cochlear implant users?
    Yucel E, Sennaroglu G.
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2007 Sep 02; 71(9):1415-22. PubMed ID: 17586056
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Patient performance with the Cochlear Corporation "20 + 2" implant: bipolar versus monopolar activation.
    Zwolan TA, Kileny PR, Ashbaugh C, Telian SA.
    Am J Otol; 1996 Sep 02; 17(5):717-23. PubMed ID: 8892567
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Age at implantation: its importance in pediatric cochlear implantation.
    Nikolopoulos TP, O'Donoghue GM, Archbold S.
    Laryngoscope; 1999 Apr 02; 109(4):595-9. PubMed ID: 10201747
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Otosclerosis: selection of ear for cochlear implantation.
    Matterson AG, O'Leary S, Pinder D, Freidman L, Dowell R, Briggs R.
    Otol Neurotol; 2007 Jun 02; 28(4):438-46. PubMed ID: 17468676
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. The relationship between the intraoperative ECAP threshold and postoperative behavioral levels: the difference between postlingually deafened adults and prelingually deafened pediatric cochlear implant users.
    Morita T, Naito Y, Hirai T, Yamaguchi S, Ito J.
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2003 Feb 02; 260(2):67-72. PubMed ID: 12582781
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Ten-year follow-up of a consecutive series of children with multichannel cochlear implants.
    Uziel AS, Sillon M, Vieu A, Artieres F, Piron JP, Daures JP, Mondain M.
    Otol Neurotol; 2007 Aug 02; 28(5):615-28. PubMed ID: 17667770
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. The Chorimac-12. A multichannel cochlear implant for total deafness. Description and clinical results.
    Chouard CH, Fugain C, Meyer B, Chabolle F.
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg; 1985 Aug 02; 39(4):735-48. PubMed ID: 3841455
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Evidence for association between perception of electrical stimuli and rehabilitation dynamics in users of the Nucleus 22-channel cochlear implant.
    Tavartkiladze GA, Frolenkov GI, Mironova EV.
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep 02; 166():181-4. PubMed ID: 7668627
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Cross-modal plasticity and speech perception in pre- and postlingually deaf cochlear implant users.
    Buckley KA, Tobey EA.
    Ear Hear; 2011 Feb 02; 32(1):2-15. PubMed ID: 20829699
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Map dynamic ranges versus duration of hearing loss in cochlear implantees.
    Shim Y, Kim H, Chang M, Kim C.
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep 02; 166():178-80. PubMed ID: 7668625
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Are cochlear implants indicated in prelingually deaf adults?
    Manrique N, Huarte A, Molina M, Perez N, Espinosa JM, Cervera-Paz FJ, Miranda I.
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep 02; 166():192-4. PubMed ID: 7668632
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Results of the round window electrical stimulation in 460 cases of total deafness.
    Meyer B, Drira M, Gegu D, Chouard CH.
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1984 Sep 02; 411():168-76. PubMed ID: 6596841
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 5.