These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

126 related items for PubMed ID: 7668634

  • 1. Predictive factors for success with a cochlear implant.
    van Dijk JE, van Olphen AF, Mens LH, Brokx JP, van den Broek P, Smoorenburg GF.
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():196-8. PubMed ID: 7668634
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Prognostic indicators of speech recognition performance in adult cochlear implant users: a prospective analysis.
    Shipp DB, Nedzelski JM.
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():194-6. PubMed ID: 7668633
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Speech perception and production in children wearing a cochlear implant in one ear and a hearing aid in the opposite ear.
    Chmiel R, Clark J, Jerger J, Jenkins H, Freeman R.
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():314-6. PubMed ID: 7668686
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Speech perception abilities of adults using a multichannel cochlear implant and frequency transposition hearing aid.
    Chute PM, Gravel JS, Popp AL.
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():260-3. PubMed ID: 7668661
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. The Chorimac-12. A multichannel cochlear implant for total deafness. Description and clinical results.
    Chouard CH, Fugain C, Meyer B, Chabolle F.
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg; 1985 Sep; 39(4):735-48. PubMed ID: 3841455
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Technique and indications for the French multichannel cochlear implant "Chorimac-12" for total deafness rehabilitation.
    Chouard CH, Fugain C, Meyer B.
    Am J Otol; 1985 Jul; 6(4):291-4. PubMed ID: 3839632
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Prognostic value of round-window psychophysical testing with cochlear-implant candidates.
    Shipp DB, Nedzelski JM.
    J Otolaryngol; 1994 Jun; 23(3):172-6. PubMed ID: 8064955
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Auditory cortical activation and speech perception in cochlear implant users: effects of implant experience and duration of deafness.
    Green KM, Julyan PJ, Hastings DL, Ramsden RT.
    Hear Res; 2005 Jul; 205(1-2):184-92. PubMed ID: 15953527
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Predictive factors in cochlear implants.
    Albu S, Babighian G.
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg; 1997 Jul; 51(1):11-6. PubMed ID: 9105476
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. [Operative indications of total deafness].
    Meyer B, Chabolle F, Fugain C, Chouard CH.
    Ann Otolaryngol Chir Cervicofac; 1988 Jul; 105(4):243-8. PubMed ID: 3408095
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Aided versus implanted speech recognition abilities in severe to profound postlingual deafness.
    Kim HN, Chung MH, Shim YJ, Yoon JS.
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():153-4. PubMed ID: 7668612
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Electrophysiological and speech perception measures of auditory processing in experienced adult cochlear implant users.
    Kelly AS, Purdy SC, Thorne PR.
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2005 Jun; 116(6):1235-46. PubMed ID: 15978485
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. [Computer-assisted rehabilitation of auditory perception after cochlear implants and hearing aid management].
    Gross M, Herrmann HW.
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1994 Mar; 73(3):143-5. PubMed ID: 8172634
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Development of speech perception abilities of profoundly deaf children: a comparison between children with cochlear implants and those with conventional hearing aids.
    Vermeulen AM, Beijk CM, Brokx JP, van den Borne S, van den Broek P.
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():215-7. PubMed ID: 7668642
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Map dynamic ranges versus duration of hearing loss in cochlear implantees.
    Shim Y, Kim H, Chang M, Kim C.
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():178-80. PubMed ID: 7668625
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. [Noninvasive electric hearing stimulation in the deaf].
    Hrubý J.
    Cesk Otolaryngol; 1982 Jan; 31(1):10-2. PubMed ID: 7067009
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Speech perception for adults who use hearing aids in conjunction with cochlear implants in opposite ears.
    Mok M, Grayden D, Dowell RC, Lawrence D.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2006 Apr; 49(2):338-51. PubMed ID: 16671848
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Evidence for association between perception of electrical stimuli and rehabilitation dynamics in users of the Nucleus 22-channel cochlear implant.
    Tavartkiladze GA, Frolenkov GI, Mironova EV.
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():181-4. PubMed ID: 7668627
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.