These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


128 related items for PubMed ID: 7668635

  • 1. Preoperative assessment of function of the auditory nerve using electroaudiometry and a notched-noise auditory brain stem response technique.
    Wagner H, Gerhardt HJ, Stürzebecher E, Werbs M.
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():198-201. PubMed ID: 7668635
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. [Brain stem potentials evoked by electric stimulation of the auditory nerve].
    Robier A, Le Scao Y.
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg; 1991 Sep; 45(2):253-6. PubMed ID: 2063671
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Promontory electrical stimulation in postoperative acoustic tumor patients.
    Lambert PR, Ruth RA, Thomas JF.
    Laryngoscope; 1992 Jul; 102(7):814-9. PubMed ID: 1614252
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. [Paired pulse discrimination test for evaluating auditory nerve function in deaf patients with cochlear prostheses].
    Yun JT, Chang Y, Wang ZZ.
    Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao; 1986 Aug; 8(4):282-5. PubMed ID: 2953476
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Intraoperative test of auditory nerve function.
    Frohne C, Lesinski A, Battmer RD, Lenarz T.
    Am J Otol; 1997 Nov; 18(6 Suppl):S93-4. PubMed ID: 9391614
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Comparison of a promontory stimulation test using a transtympanic needle electrode with a test using an ear canal electrode.
    Khan S, Raine CH, Becconsall K.
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():190-2. PubMed ID: 7668631
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Exploratory cochleotomy. Assessment of auditory nerve excitability and anatomical conditions in cochlear implant candidates.
    Montandon P, Kasper A, Pelizzone M.
    ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 1992 Sep; 54(6):295-8. PubMed ID: 1475098
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. [Experience with electrostimulation of the acoustic nerve before cochlea implantation].
    Hoth S, Lenarz T.
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1991 Apr; 70(4):199-207. PubMed ID: 2054026
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Effectiveness of different electrical stimulation conditions in preservation of spiral ganglion cells following deafness.
    Miller JM, Altschuler RA.
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():57-60. PubMed ID: 7668758
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Evoked potentials from the auditory nerve following sinusoidal electrical stimulation of the cochlea: new possibilities for preoperative testing in cochlear-implant candidates?
    Hartmann R, Pfennigdorff T, Klinke R.
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1994 Sep; 114(5):495-500. PubMed ID: 7825430
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Electromagnetic stimulation of the auditory system: effects and side-effects.
    Counter SA.
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1993 Sep; 37():1-32. PubMed ID: 8210963
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. [Electrophysiological tests in the evaluation of selection for cochlear implants].
    Fraysse B, Vincent M, Corvera G, Estève-Fraysse MJ, Deguine O.
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg; 1991 Sep; 45(2):247-51. PubMed ID: 2063670
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.