These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

144 related items for PubMed ID: 7670010

  • 1. [Thoracic radiography in intensive care units. Comparison of an asymmetric film-screen-grid combination with an L-film].
    Luska G, von Boetticher H, Amling B, Herzog R.
    Rofo; 1995 Aug; 163(2):104-10. PubMed ID: 7670010
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. [Thoracic radiographs with the AMBER system. A comparison of the diagnostic image quality of film-screen and storage-phosphor radiographs on the grid-partition stand and the AMBER system].
    Busch HP, Hartmann J, Freund MC, Lehmann KJ, Georgi M, Richter K.
    Rofo; 1992 Mar; 156(3):241-6. PubMed ID: 1550921
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Portable chest imaging: comparison of storage phosphor digital, asymmetric screen-film, and conventional screen-film systems.
    Niklason LT, Chan HP, Cascade PN, Chang CL, Chee PW, Mathews JF.
    Radiology; 1993 Feb; 186(2):387-93. PubMed ID: 8421740
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Evaluating radiographic parameters for mobile chest computed radiography: phantoms, image quality and effective dose.
    Rill LN, Brateman L, Arreola M.
    Med Phys; 2003 Oct; 30(10):2727-35. PubMed ID: 14596311
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Clinical evaluation of twin screen-film chest radiography: cost effective lung and mediastinal imaging.
    McLean D, Gray JE, Swensen SJ, Vrieze TJ.
    Eur J Radiol; 1998 Mar; 27(1):61-6. PubMed ID: 9587769
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. A new asymmetric screen-film combination for conventional chest radiography: evaluation in 50 patients.
    Swensen SJ, Gray JE, Brown LR, Aughenbaugh GL, Harms GF, Stears J.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Mar; 160(3):483-6. PubMed ID: 8430540
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. [The reduction of the radiation dosage by means of storage phosphor-film radiography compared to a conventional film-screen system with a grid cassette on a skull phantom].
    Heyne JP, Merbold H, Sehner J, Neumann R, Freesmeyer M, Jonetz-Mentzel L, Kaiser WA.
    Rofo; 1999 Jul; 171(1):54-9. PubMed ID: 10464506
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Sensitometric properties of Agfa Dentus OrthoLux, Agfa Dentus ST8G, and Kodak Ektavision panoramic radiographic film.
    Wakoh M, Nishikawa K, Kobayashi N, Farman AG, Kuroyanagi K.
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2001 Feb; 91(2):244-51. PubMed ID: 11174605
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. A comparison of an Agfa and Kodak film-screen combination for mammography.
    Dudson J.
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 1994 Dec; 17(4):211-6. PubMed ID: 7872903
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Technical aspects of twin screen-film chest radiography: cost effective lung and mediastinal imaging.
    McLean D, Gray JE, Swensen SJ, Vrieze TJ.
    Eur J Radiol; 1998 Mar; 27(1):53-60. PubMed ID: 9587768
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. [High intensification film-screen systems in thoracic diagnosis. A clinical comparative study].
    Schäfer CB, Sokiranski R, Claussen CD.
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1995 Nov; 5(6):389-93. PubMed ID: 8580141
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. [Clinical evaluation of asymmetric film-screen system for thoracic lesions].
    Shimizu T, Yamamoto K, Ogura Y, Aratake K, Nakata Y, Saika Y, Sagami A, Ashina K, Sueyoshi K, Narabayashi I.
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1994 May 25; 54(6):465-70. PubMed ID: 8028952
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Dose reduction in patients undergoing chest imaging: digital amorphous silicon flat-panel detector radiography versus conventional film-screen radiography and phosphor-based computed radiography.
    Bacher K, Smeets P, Bonnarens K, De Hauwere A, Verstraete K, Thierens H.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Oct 25; 181(4):923-9. PubMed ID: 14500203
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.