These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. The impact of specimen management in microbiology. Miller JM. MLO Med Lab Obs; 1998 May; 30(5):28-30, 32, 34; quiz 35-6. PubMed ID: 10179685 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [Improvement of routine works and quality control in mycobacterial laboratory]. Suzuki K, Higuchi T. Kekkaku; 2007 Mar; 82(3):217-27. PubMed ID: 17444126 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [ISO 15189 accreditation in clinical microbiology laboratory: general concepts and the status in our laboratory]. Akyar I. Mikrobiyol Bul; 2009 Oct; 43(4):683-97. PubMed ID: 20084925 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Quality improvements in the preanalytical phase: focus on urine specimen workflow. Stankovic AK, DiLauri E. Clin Lab Med; 2008 Jun; 28(2):339-50, viii. PubMed ID: 18436075 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. [Present situation and problems of the transportation of samples by clinical laboratory centers]. Yoshida H. Rinsho Byori; 1991 Jan; 39(1):46-9. PubMed ID: 2008040 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The preanalytical phase--can the requirements of the DIN-EN-ISO 15189 be met practically for all laboratories? A view of the "German situation". Wood WG. Clin Lab; 2005 Jan; 51(11-12):665-71. PubMed ID: 16329626 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of non-analytical factors on the quality of laboratory results. Manochiopinij S, Sirisali K, Leelahakul P. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health; 1999 Jan; 30 Suppl 3():50-3. PubMed ID: 10926259 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Facility capability assessment. McCandless J. Qual Assur; 1994 Jun; 3(2):156-66. PubMed ID: 7804631 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Assessment of the impact of a CD4+ T-cell testing laboratory improvement program. Rosner E, Siragusa M, Schalla W, Cross D, Cohn R, Hearn T. Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1998 Jun; 122(6):512-9. PubMed ID: 9625418 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. A quality manual for the clinical laboratory including the elements of a quality system. Proposed guidelines. Dybkaer R, Jordal R, Jørgensen PJ, Hansson P, Hjelm M, Kaihola HL, Kallner A, Rustad P, Uldall A, de Verdier CH. Scand J Clin Lab Invest Suppl; 1993 Jun; 212():60-84. PubMed ID: 8465158 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The external quality assessment schemes in Thailand. Opartkiattikul N, Bejrachandra S. Rinsho Byori; 2002 Feb; 50(2):121-5. PubMed ID: 11925846 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Drug-testing methods and clinical interpretations of test results. Kapur BM. Bull Narc; 1993 Feb; 45(2):115-54. PubMed ID: 7920539 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Quality control in coagulation testing. Plebani M, Sanzari MC, Zardo L. Semin Thromb Hemost; 2008 Oct; 34(7):642-6. PubMed ID: 19085764 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. A survey of quality indicator use in the clinical laboratory. Preston LJ. Clin Lab Sci; 2008 Oct; 21(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 18335858 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Practical solution for control of the pre-analytical phase in decentralized clinical laboratories for meeting the requirements of the medical laboratory accreditation standard DIN EN ISO 15189. Vacata V, Jahns-Streubel G, Baldus M, Wood WG. Clin Lab; 2007 Oct; 53(3-4):211-5. PubMed ID: 17447659 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [Quality of the performance of clinical laboratories]. Endróczi E. Orv Hetil; 1996 Jun 09; 137(23):1251-8. PubMed ID: 8757095 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The quality of laboratory testing today: an assessment of sigma metrics for analytic quality using performance data from proficiency testing surveys and the CLIA criteria for acceptable performance. Westgard JO, Westgard SA. Am J Clin Pathol; 2006 Mar 09; 125(3):343-54. PubMed ID: 16613337 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]