These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. A randomized trial of intrapartum electronic fetal heart rate monitoring versus intermittent auscultation. Vintzileos AM, Antsaklis A, Varvarigos I, Papas C, Sofatzis I, Montgomery JT. Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Jun 18; 81(6):899-907. PubMed ID: 8497353 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Central fetal monitoring: effect on perinatal outcomes and cesarean section rate. Withiam-Leitch M, Shelton J, Fleming E. Birth; 2006 Dec 18; 33(4):284-8. PubMed ID: 17150066 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Cesarean section on request at 39 weeks: impact on shoulder dystocia, fetal trauma, neonatal encephalopathy, and intrauterine fetal demise. Hankins GD, Clark SM, Munn MB. Semin Perinatol; 2006 Oct 18; 30(5):276-87. PubMed ID: 17011400 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The effect of routine early amniotomy on spontaneous labor: a meta-analysis. Brisson-Carroll G, Fraser W, Bréart G, Krauss I, Thornton J. Obstet Gynecol; 1996 May 18; 87(5 Pt 2):891-6. PubMed ID: 8677130 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. A randomized trial of electronic fetal monitoring in preterm labor. Luthy DA, Shy KK, van Belle G, Larson EB, Hughes JP, Benedetti TJ, Brown ZA, Effer S, King JF, Stenchever MA. Obstet Gynecol; 1987 May 18; 69(5):687-95. PubMed ID: 3554055 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The use of intrapartum electronic fetal heart rate monitoring: a national survey. Devane D, Lalor J, Bonnar J. Ir Med J; 2007 Feb 18; 100(2):360-2. PubMed ID: 17432809 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of aspirin consumption during pregnancy on pregnancy outcomes: meta-analysis. Kozer E, Costei AM, Boskovic R, Nulman I, Nikfar S, Koren G. Birth Defects Res B Dev Reprod Toxicol; 2003 Feb 18; 68(1):70-84. PubMed ID: 12852485 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor induction: a meta-analysis. Sanchez-Ramos L, Kaunitz AM, Wears RL, Delke I, Gaudier FL. Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Apr 18; 89(4):633-42. PubMed ID: 9083326 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Intrapartum electronic fetal monitoring in low-risk pregnancies. Westgren M, Ingemarsson E, Ingemarsson I, Solum T. Obstet Gynecol; 1980 Sep 18; 56(3):301-4. PubMed ID: 7422168 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Auscultation of the fetal heart presents advantages over electronic monitoring. Sandmire HF, DeMott RK. Wis Med J; 1995 Dec 18; 94(12):661-3. PubMed ID: 8571614 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Effectiveness of electronic fetal monitoring with additional ST analysis in vertex singleton pregnancies at >36 weeks of gestation: an individual participant data metaanalysis. Schuit E, Amer-Wahlin I, Ojala K, Vayssière C, Westerhuis ME, Maršál K, Tekay A, Saade GR, Visser GH, Groenwold RH, Moons KG, Mol BW, Kwee A. Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Mar 18; 208(3):187.e1-187.e13. PubMed ID: 23333546 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. ST analysis of the fetal electrocardiogram in intrapartum fetal monitoring: a meta-analysis. Becker JH, Bax L, Amer-Wåhlin I, Ojala K, Vayssière C, Westerhuis ME, Mol BW, Visser GH, Maršál K, Kwee A, Moons KG. Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Jan 18; 119(1):145-54. PubMed ID: 22183222 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Electronic fetal monitoring during labor. Kurse J. J Fam Pract; 1982 Jul 18; 15(1):35-42. PubMed ID: 7086382 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]