These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

350 related items for PubMed ID: 7685678

  • 1. Identification of pig chromosomes in pig-mouse somatic cell hybrid bivariate flow karyotypes.
    Bouvet A, Konfortov BA, Miller NG, Brown D, Tucker EM.
    Cytometry; 1993; 14(4):369-76. PubMed ID: 7685678
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Quantification of the DNA content of structurally abnormal X chromosomes and X chromosome aneuploidy using high resolution bivariate flow karyotyping.
    Trask B, van den Engh G, Nussbaum R, Schwartz C, Gray J.
    Cytometry; 1990; 11(1):184-95. PubMed ID: 2106419
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Swine chromosomal DNA quantification by bivariate flow karyotyping and karyotype interpretation.
    Schmitz A, Chaput B, Fouchet P, Guilly MN, Frelat G, Vaiman M.
    Cytometry; 1992; 13(7):703-10. PubMed ID: 1451601
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Preparative dual-beam sorting of the human Y chromosome and in situ hybridization of cloned DNA probes.
    Cremer C, Rappold G, Gray JW, Müller CR, Ropers HH.
    Cytometry; 1984 Nov; 5(6):572-9. PubMed ID: 6549159
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Bivariate flow karyotyping of human chromosomes: evaluation of variation in Hoechst 33258 fluorescence, chromomycin A3 fluorescence, and relative chromosomal DNA content.
    Boschman GA, Rens W, van Oven CH, Manders EM, Aten JA.
    Cytometry; 1991 Nov; 12(6):559-69. PubMed ID: 1722448
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Accurate characterization of porcine bivariate flow karyotype by PCR and fluorescence in situ hybridization.
    Yerle M, Schmitz A, Milan D, Chaput B, Monteagudo L, Vaiman M, Frelat G, Gellin J.
    Genomics; 1993 Apr; 16(1):97-103. PubMed ID: 8486390
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Preparation and bivariate analysis of suspensions of human chromosomes.
    van den Engh GJ, Trask BJ, Gray JW, Langlois RG, Yu LC.
    Cytometry; 1985 Mar; 6(2):92-100. PubMed ID: 2579781
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Centromeric index versus DNA content flow karyotypes of human chromosomes measured by means of slit-scan flow cytometry.
    Lucas JN, Gray JW.
    Cytometry; 1987 May; 8(3):273-9. PubMed ID: 3595351
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. [A new approach to the analysis of complex chromosomal rearrangements in cell hybrids].
    Rubtsov NB, Pliusnina EV, Serdiukova NA, Astakhova NM, Biltueva LS, Kuznetsov SB, Grafodatskiĭ AS, Zhdanova NS.
    Genetika; 1998 Feb; 34(2):240-7. PubMed ID: 9589854
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Chromosome banding analysis by slit-scan flow cytometry.
    Bartholdi MF, Meyne J, Johnston RG, Cram LS.
    Cytometry; 1989 Mar; 10(2):124-33. PubMed ID: 2496955
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Analysis of bivariate flow karyotypes.
    Dean PN, Kolla S, Van Dilla MA.
    Cytometry; 1989 Mar; 10(2):109-23. PubMed ID: 2469555
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 18.