These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. CAT/CLAMS: its use in detecting early childhood cognitive impairment. Kube DA, Wilson WM, Petersen MC, Palmer FB. Pediatr Neurol; 2000 Sep; 23(3):208-15. PubMed ID: 11033282 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The Clinical Linguistic and Auditory Milestone Scale (CLAMS). Identification of cognitive defects in motor-delayed children. Capute AJ, Shapiro BK, Wachtel RC, Gunther VA, Palmer FB. Am J Dis Child; 1986 Jul; 140(7):694-8. PubMed ID: 2424299 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. CAT/CLAMS. A tool for the pediatric evaluation of infants and young children with developmental delay. Clinical Adaptive Test/Clinical Linguistic and Auditory Milestone Scale. Wachtel RC, Shapiro BK, Palmer FB, Allen MC, Capute AJ. Clin Pediatr (Phila); 1994 Jul; 33(7):410-5. PubMed ID: 7525138 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Establishing the norm of Cognitive Adaptive Test/Clinical Linguistic and Auditory Milestone Scale (CAT/CLAMS) in Chinese infants. Chang YC, Huang CC, Hu SC. Zhonghua Min Guo Xiao Er Ke Yi Xue Hui Za Zhi; 1998 Jul; 39(5):306-13. PubMed ID: 9823675 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Validity of the Clinical Adaptive Test (CAT)/Clinical Linguistic and Auditory Milestone Scale (CLAMS) as a screening instrument for very low birth weight infants in Taiwan. Wang LW, Wang ST, Huang CC. J Dev Behav Pediatr; 2005 Dec; 26(6):412-8. PubMed ID: 16344657 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The CAT/CLAMS assessment for early intervention services. Clinical Adaptive Test/Clinical Linguistic and Auditory Milestone Scale. Rossman MJ, Hyman SL, Rorabaugh ML, Berlin LE, Allen MC, Modlin JF. Clin Pediatr (Phila); 1994 Jul; 33(7):404-9. PubMed ID: 7525137 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [Establishing the norm of cognitive adaptive test/clinical linguistic and auditory milestone scale in the children from 4 to 36 months of age in Shanghai, China]. Bian XY, Tang L, Dong XY, Li HR, Peng YM, Chen R, Wang DS, Jiang DY, Huang Z. Zhonghua Er Ke Za Zhi; 2005 Oct; 43(10):782-6. PubMed ID: 16255861 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Performance of the Parent Report of Children's Abilities-Revised (PARCA-R) versus the Bayley Scales of Infant Development III. Martin AJ, Darlow BA, Salt A, Hague W, Sebastian L, McNeill N, Tarnow-Mordi W. Arch Dis Child; 2013 Dec; 98(12):955-8. PubMed ID: 24030249 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of Griffiths-II and Bayley-II tests for the developmental assessment of high-risk infants. Cirelli I, Bickle Graz M, Tolsa JF. Infant Behav Dev; 2015 Nov; 41():17-25. PubMed ID: 26276119 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The Child Development Inventory: A developmental outcome measure for follow-up of the high-risk infant. Doig KB, Macias MM, Saylor CF, Craver JR, Ingram PE. J Pediatr; 1999 Sep; 135(3):358-62. PubMed ID: 10484803 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Developmental and functional outcomes in children with a positive newborn screen for Krabbe disease: a pilot study of a phone-based interview surveillance technique. Duffner PK, Granger C, Lyon N, Niewczyk P, Barczykowski A, Bauer S, Msall ME. J Pediatr; 2012 Aug; 161(2):258-63.e1. PubMed ID: 22381022 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]