These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

324 related items for PubMed ID: 7688285

  • 21.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Age-related differences in sensitivity to small changes in frequency assessed with cortical evoked potentials.
    Harris KC, Mills JH, He NJ, Dubno JR.
    Hear Res; 2008 Sep; 243(1-2):47-56. PubMed ID: 18597958
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Long-latency auditory evoked potentials with verbal and nonverbal stimuli.
    Oppitz SJ, Didoné DD, Silva DD, Gois M, Folgearini J, Ferreira GC, Garcia MV.
    Braz J Otorhinolaryngol; 2015 Sep; 81(6):647-52. PubMed ID: 26480901
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Differences in evoked potentials during the active processing of sound location and motion.
    Richter N, Schröger E, Rübsamen R.
    Neuropsychologia; 2013 Jun; 51(7):1204-14. PubMed ID: 23499852
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Effects of stimulus modality and response mode on the P300 event-related potential differentiation of young and elderly adults.
    Knott V, Bradford L, Dulude L, Millar A, Alwahabi F, Lau T, Shea C, Wiens A.
    Clin Electroencephalogr; 2003 Oct; 34(4):182-90. PubMed ID: 14560818
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Dynamics of narrow-band EEG phase effects in the passive auditory oddball task.
    Barry RJ, Rushby JA, Smith JL, Clarke AR, Croft RJ.
    Eur J Neurosci; 2006 Jul; 24(1):291-304. PubMed ID: 16882025
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Human auditory and somatosensory event-related potentials: effects of response condition and age.
    Barrett G, Neshige R, Shibasaki H.
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1987 Apr; 66(4):409-19. PubMed ID: 2435521
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Evaluation of auditory, visual and olfactory event-related potentials for comparing interspersed- and single-stimulus paradigms.
    Nordin S, Andersson L, Olofsson JK, McCormack M, Polich J.
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2011 Sep; 81(3):252-62. PubMed ID: 21756945
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Effects of inter-stimulus interval (ISI) duration on the N1 and P2 components of the auditory event-related potential.
    Pereira DR, Cardoso S, Ferreira-Santos F, Fernandes C, Cunha-Reis C, Paiva TO, Almeida PR, Silveira C, Barbosa F, Marques-Teixeira J.
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2014 Dec; 94(3):311-8. PubMed ID: 25304172
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. P300 from a single-stimulus paradigm: auditory intensity and tone frequency effects.
    Cass M, Polich J.
    Biol Psychol; 1997 Jun 20; 46(1):51-65. PubMed ID: 9255431
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Latency variability and temporal interrelationships of the auditory event-related potentials (N1, P2, N2, and P3) in normal subjects.
    Michalewski HJ, Prasher DK, Starr A.
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1986 Jan 20; 65(1):59-71. PubMed ID: 2416547
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 17.