These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

168 related items for PubMed ID: 7705912

  • 1. A computational model for the neurobiological substrates of visual attention.
    de Carvalho LA, Roitman VL.
    Int J Biomed Comput; 1995 Jan; 38(1):33-45. PubMed ID: 7705912
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Axonal Conduction Delays, Brain State, and Corticogeniculate Communication.
    Stoelzel CR, Bereshpolova Y, Alonso JM, Swadlow HA.
    J Neurosci; 2017 Jun 28; 37(26):6342-6358. PubMed ID: 28559382
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. A feedback model of visual attention.
    Spratling MW, Johnson MH.
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2004 Mar 28; 16(2):219-37. PubMed ID: 15068593
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Invariant visual responses from attentional gain fields.
    Salinas E, Abbott LF.
    J Neurophysiol; 1997 Jun 28; 77(6):3267-72. PubMed ID: 9212273
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Selective visual attention in a neurocomputational model of phase oscillators.
    Wu Z, Guo A.
    Biol Cybern; 1999 Mar 28; 80(3):205-14. PubMed ID: 10192903
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Feedback decoding of spatially structured population activity in cortical maps.
    Swindale NV.
    Neural Comput; 2008 Jan 28; 20(1):176-204. PubMed ID: 18045005
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Receptive field self-organization in a model of the fine structure in v1 cortical columns.
    Lücke J.
    Neural Comput; 2009 Oct 28; 21(10):2805-45. PubMed ID: 19548804
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Tuning curve shift by attention modulation in cortical neurons: a computational study of its mechanisms.
    Compte A, Wang XJ.
    Cereb Cortex; 2006 Jun 28; 16(6):761-78. PubMed ID: 16135783
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Stimulus Dependence of Correlated Variability across Cortical Areas.
    Ruff DA, Cohen MR.
    J Neurosci; 2016 Jul 13; 36(28):7546-56. PubMed ID: 27413163
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Modeling the thalamocortical loop.
    de Carvalho LA.
    Int J Biomed Comput; 1994 May 13; 35(4):267-96. PubMed ID: 8063455
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Lateral inhibition pyramidal neural network for image classification.
    Fernandes BJ, Cavalcanti GD, Ren TI.
    IEEE Trans Cybern; 2013 Dec 13; 43(6):2082-91. PubMed ID: 23757517
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. The different stages of visual recognition need different attentional binding strategies.
    Tsotsos JK, Rodríguez-Sánchez AJ, Rothenstein AL, Simine E.
    Brain Res; 2008 Aug 15; 1225():119-32. PubMed ID: 18585692
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. A model of non-linear interactions between cortical top-down and horizontal connections explains the attentional gating of collinear facilitation.
    De Meyer K, Spratling MW.
    Vision Res; 2009 Mar 15; 49(5):553-68. PubMed ID: 19162060
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.