These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

172 related items for PubMed ID: 7714263

  • 1. Effects of carrier frequency, modulation rate, and modulation waveform on the detection of modulation and the discrimination of modulation type (amplitude modulation versus frequency modulation).
    Moore BC, Sek A.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Apr; 97(4):2468-78. PubMed ID: 7714263
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Discrimination of modulation type (amplitude modulation or frequency modulation) with and without background noise.
    Moore BC, Sek A.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Aug; 96(2 Pt 1):726-32. PubMed ID: 7930073
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Detection of quasitrapezoidal frequency and amplitude modulation.
    Sek A, Moore BC.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Mar; 107(3):1598-604. PubMed ID: 10738813
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Detection of frequency modulation at low modulation rates: evidence for a mechanism based on phase locking.
    Moore BC, Sek A.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Oct; 100(4 Pt 1):2320-31. PubMed ID: 8865639
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Detection of combined frequency and amplitude modulation.
    Moore BC, Sek A.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Dec; 92(6):3119-31. PubMed ID: 1474227
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Dependence of frequency modulation detection on frequency modulation coherence across carriers: effects of modulation rate, harmonicity, and roving of the carrier frequencies.
    Furukawa S, Moore BC.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1997 Mar; 101(3):1632-43. PubMed ID: 9069630
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Detection of frequency modulation by hearing-impaired listeners: effects of carrier frequency, modulation rate, and added amplitude modulation.
    Moore BC, Skrodzka E.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Jan; 111(1 Pt 1):327-35. PubMed ID: 11833538
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Detection of auditory "events" based on amplitude and frequency modulation.
    Sek A, Moore BC.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Oct; 100(4 Pt 1):2332-40. PubMed ID: 8865640
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Frequency modulation versus amplitude modulation discrimination: evidence for a second frequency modulation encoding mechanism.
    Edwards BW, Viemeister NF.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Aug; 96(2 Pt 1):733-40. PubMed ID: 7930074
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Effects of carrier frequency and background noise on the detection of mixed modulation.
    Moore BC, Sek A.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Aug; 96(2 Pt 1):741-51. PubMed ID: 7930075
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Across-channel processes in frequency modulation detection.
    Furukawa S, Moore BC.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Oct; 100(4 Pt 1):2299-311. PubMed ID: 8865637
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Discrimination of the phase of amplitude modulation applied to different carriers: Effects of modulation rate and modulation depth for young and older subjects.
    Moore BCJ, Sęk AP.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2019 Sep; 146(3):1696. PubMed ID: 31590555
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Effects of Age and Hearing Loss on the Discrimination of Amplitude and Frequency Modulation for 2- and 10-Hz Rates.
    Moore BCJ, Mariathasan S, Sęk AP.
    Trends Hear; 2019 Sep; 23():2331216519853963. PubMed ID: 31250705
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Frequency modulation detection: effects of age, psychophysical method, and modulation waveform.
    He NJ, Mills JH, Dubno JR.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Jul; 122(1):467-77. PubMed ID: 17614504
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Detection of mixed modulation using correlated and uncorrelated noise modulators.
    Sek A, Moore BC.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Jun; 95(6):3511-7. PubMed ID: 8046142
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Frequency modulation detection with simultaneous amplitude modulation by cochlear implant users.
    Luo X, Fu QJ.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Aug; 122(2):1046-54. PubMed ID: 17672652
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Effect of the relative phase of amplitude modulation on the detection of modulation on two carriers.
    Furukawa S, Moore BC.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1997 Dec; 102(6):3657-64. PubMed ID: 9407657
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Double-pass consistency for amplitude- and frequency-modulation detection in normal-hearing listeners.
    Attia S, King A, Varnet L, Ponsot E, Lorenzi C.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2021 Nov; 150(5):3631. PubMed ID: 34852611
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Comparing the effects of age on amplitude modulation and frequency modulation detection.
    Wallaert N, Moore BC, Lorenzi C.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Jun; 139(6):3088. PubMed ID: 27369130
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Second-order modulation detection thresholds for pure-tone and narrow-band noise carriers.
    Lorenzi C, Simpson MI, Millman RE, Griffiths TD, Woods WP, Rees A, Green GG.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Nov; 110(5 Pt 1):2470-8. PubMed ID: 11757936
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.