These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

467 related items for PubMed ID: 7717212

  • 1. The comparative value of mammographic screening for women 40-49 years old versus women 50-64 years old.
    Curpen BN, Sickles EA, Sollitto RA, Ominsky SH, Galvin HB, Frankel SD.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 May; 164(5):1099-103. PubMed ID: 7717212
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Results of intermediate measures from a population-based, randomized trial of mammographic screening prevalence and detection of breast carcinoma among Asian women: the Singapore Breast Screening Project.
    Ng EH, Ng FC, Tan PH, Low SC, Chiang G, Tan KP, Seow A, Emmanuel S, Tan CH, Ho GH, Ng LT, Wilde CC.
    Cancer; 1998 Apr 15; 82(8):1521-8. PubMed ID: 9554530
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Mammographic screening in women more than 64 years old: a comparison of 1- and 2-year intervals.
    Field LR, Wilson TE, Strawderman M, Gabriel H, Helvie MA.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Apr 15; 170(4):961-5. PubMed ID: 9530044
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Incidence of invasive breast cancer and ductal carcinoma in situ in a screening program by age: should older women continue screening?
    Erbas B, Amos A, Fletcher A, Kavanagh AM, Gertig DM.
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2004 Oct 15; 13(10):1569-73. PubMed ID: 15466971
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Screening mammography: value in women 35-39 years old.
    Liberman L, Dershaw DD, Deutch BM, Thaler HT, Lippin BS.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Jul 15; 161(1):53-6. PubMed ID: 8517320
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Clinical and self breast examination remain important in the era of modern screening.
    Ma I, Dueck A, Gray R, Wasif N, Giurescu M, Lorans R, Pizzitola V, Pockaj B.
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2012 May 15; 19(5):1484-90. PubMed ID: 22160521
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Mammography in 40-year-old women: what difference does it make? The potential impact of the U.S. Preventative Services Task Force (USPSTF) mammography guidelines.
    Shen N, Hammonds LS, Madsen D, Dale P.
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2011 Oct 15; 18(11):3066-71. PubMed ID: 21863364
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Interval breast cancers in the Screening Mammography Program of British Columbia: analysis and classification.
    Burhenne HJ, Burhenne LW, Goldberg F, Hislop TG, Worth AJ, Rebbeck PM, Kan L.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 May 15; 162(5):1067-71; discussion 1072-5. PubMed ID: 8165983
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Potential impact of USPSTF recommendations on early diagnosis of breast cancer.
    Aragon R, Morgan J, Wong JH, Lum S.
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2011 Oct 15; 18(11):3137-42. PubMed ID: 21947591
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Influence of mammographic parenchymal pattern in screening-detected and interval invasive breast cancers on pathologic features, mammographic features, and patient survival.
    Porter GJ, Evans AJ, Cornford EJ, Burrell HC, James JJ, Lee AH, Chakrabarti J.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Mar 15; 188(3):676-83. PubMed ID: 17312053
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Biologic characteristics of breast cancer detected by mammography and by palpation in a screening program: a pilot study.
    Tweedie E, Tonkin K, Kerkvliet N, Doig GS, Sparrow RK, O'Malley FP.
    Clin Invest Med; 1997 Oct 15; 20(5):300-7. PubMed ID: 9336655
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Update of the Swedish two-county program of mammographic screening for breast cancer.
    Tabàr L, Fagerberg G, Duffy SW, Day NE, Gad A, Gröntoft O.
    Radiol Clin North Am; 1992 Jan 15; 30(1):187-210. PubMed ID: 1732926
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. [Comparison of breast cancers diagnosed in and outside of the large scale mammography program of the Ariana area of Tunisia].
    Zeghal D, Mahjoub S, Zakraoui MA, Zouari F.
    Tunis Med; 2009 Jul 15; 87(7):450-3. PubMed ID: 20063678
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Positive predictive value of screening mammography by age and family history of breast cancer.
    Kerlikowske K, Grady D, Barclay J, Sickles EA, Eaton A, Ernster V.
    JAMA; 1993 Nov 24; 270(20):2444-50. PubMed ID: 8230621
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Breast cancer screening by mammography in women aged under 50 years in Japan.
    Morimoto T, Sasa M, Yamaguchi T, Kondo H, Akaiwa H, Sagara Y.
    Anticancer Res; 2000 Nov 24; 20(5C):3689-94. PubMed ID: 11268440
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Increased mammography use and its impact on earlier breast cancer detection in Vermont, 1975-1999.
    Vacek PM, Geller BM, Weaver DL, Foster RS.
    Cancer; 2002 Apr 15; 94(8):2160-8. PubMed ID: 12001112
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Comparison of the performance of screening mammography, physical examination, and breast US and evaluation of factors that influence them: an analysis of 27,825 patient evaluations.
    Kolb TM, Lichy J, Newhouse JH.
    Radiology; 2002 Oct 15; 225(1):165-75. PubMed ID: 12355001
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Clinical efficacy of mammographic screening in the elderly.
    Faulk RM, Sickles EA, Sollitto RA, Ominsky SH, Galvin HB, Frankel SD.
    Radiology; 1995 Jan 15; 194(1):193-7. PubMed ID: 7997552
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 24.