These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


83 related items for PubMed ID: 7717634

  • 1. Influence of processing strategies on cochlear implant performance.
    Cohen NL, Waltzman SB.
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Apr; 165():9-14. PubMed ID: 7717634
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Audiologic results with the MSP/MPEAK and WSP/F0F1F2 processors and coding strategies for the nucleus cochlear implant.
    Pijl S.
    J Otolaryngol; 1994 Aug; 23(4):286-91. PubMed ID: 7996630
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Results of speech processor upgrade in a population of Veterans Affairs cochlear implant recipients.
    Cohen NL, Waltzman SB, Roland JT, Bromberg B, Cambron N, Gibbs L, Parkinson W, Snead C.
    Am J Otol; 1997 Jul; 18(4):462-5. PubMed ID: 9233486
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Comparison of speech processing strategies used in the Clarion implant processor.
    Loizou PC, Stickney G, Mishra L, Assmann P.
    Ear Hear; 2003 Feb; 24(1):12-9. PubMed ID: 12598809
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Speech perception in children using the advanced Speak speech-processing strategy.
    Cowan RS, Brown C, Whitford LA, Galvin KL, Sarant JZ, Barker EJ, Shaw S, King A, Skok M, Seligman PM.
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():318-21. PubMed ID: 7668688
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Electrophysiological and speech perception measures of auditory processing in experienced adult cochlear implant users.
    Kelly AS, Purdy SC, Thorne PR.
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2005 Jun; 116(6):1235-46. PubMed ID: 15978485
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Electrodographic analysis and field evaluation of the Speak coding strategy.
    Dillier N, Bögli H, Lai WK.
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():354-6. PubMed ID: 7668703
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Comparison of two cochlear implant speech processors in better versus poorer performers.
    Cafarelli Dees D, George C, Stevenson F, Sheridan C, Haacke NP.
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():258-60. PubMed ID: 7668660
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Japanese-language results for the speak strategy from Cochlear Pty Limited.
    Funasaka S, Shiroma M, Yukawa K.
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():265-8. PubMed ID: 7668663
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Longitudinal changes in children's speech and voice physiology after cochlear implantation.
    Higgins MB, McCleary EA, Carney AE, Schulte L.
    Ear Hear; 2003 Feb; 24(1):48-70. PubMed ID: 12598813
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Speech perception with the ACE and the SPEAK speech coding strategies for children implanted with the Nucleus cochlear implant.
    Manrique M, Huarte A, Morera C, Caballé L, Ramos A, Castillo C, García-Ibáñez L, Estrada E, Juan E.
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2005 Dec; 69(12):1667-74. PubMed ID: 16168497
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Cochlear implants in post-lingually deafened patients.
    Hiraumi H, Tsuji J, Kanemaru S, Fujino K, Ito J.
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 2007 Feb; (557):17-21. PubMed ID: 17453437
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Performance of subjects fit with the Advanced Bionics CII and Nucleus 3G cochlear implant devices.
    Spahr AJ, Dorman MF.
    Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2004 May; 130(5):624-8. PubMed ID: 15148187
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Evaluation of a new spectral peak coding strategy for the Nucleus 22 Channel Cochlear Implant System.
    Skinner MW, Clark GM, Whitford LA, Seligman PM, Staller SJ, Shipp DB, Shallop JK, Everingham C, Menapace CM, Arndt PL.
    Am J Otol; 1994 Nov; 15 Suppl 2():15-27. PubMed ID: 8572106
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Factors associated with development of speech perception skills in children implanted by age five.
    Geers A, Brenner C, Davidson L.
    Ear Hear; 2003 Feb; 24(1 Suppl):24S-35S. PubMed ID: 12612478
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Speech, language, and reading skills after early cochlear implantation.
    Geers AE.
    Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2004 May; 130(5):634-8. PubMed ID: 15148189
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Production and perception of speech intonation in pediatric cochlear implant recipients and individuals with normal hearing.
    Peng SC, Tomblin JB, Turner CW.
    Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):336-51. PubMed ID: 18344873
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Variables affecting implant performance in children.
    Miyamoto RT, Osberger MJ, Todd SL, Robbins AM, Stroer BS, Zimmerman-Phillips S, Carney AE.
    Laryngoscope; 1994 Sep; 104(9):1120-4. PubMed ID: 8072359
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Identification of speech by cochlear implant recipients with the Multipeak (MPEAK) and Spectral Peak (SPEAK) speech coding strategies. I. Vowels.
    Skinner MW, Fourakis MS, Holden TA, Holden LK, Demorest ME.
    Ear Hear; 1996 Jun; 17(3):182-97. PubMed ID: 8807261
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 5.