These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

133 related items for PubMed ID: 7723208

  • 1. The usefulness of the Noise-Field Test as a screening method for visual field defects.
    Adachi M, Shirato S.
    Jpn J Ophthalmol; 1994; 38(4):392-9. PubMed ID: 7723208
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Subjective detection of visual field defects using home TV set.
    Shirato S, Adachi M, Hara T.
    Jpn J Ophthalmol; 1991; 35(3):273-81. PubMed ID: 1770667
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Testing for glaucoma with frequency-doubling perimetry in normals, ocular hypertensives, and glaucoma patients.
    Horn FK, Wakili N, Jünemann AM, Korth M.
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2002 Aug; 240(8):658-65. PubMed ID: 12192460
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. [White-noise field campimetry before and after artificial increase of intraocular pressure. Possible applications in diagnosis and evaluation of glaucoma].
    Schiefer U, Ulrich WD, Ulrich C, Wilhelm H, Aulhorn E.
    Ophthalmologe; 1992 Dec; 89(6):477-88. PubMed ID: 1486264
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. [Detection of glaucomatous visual field defects using masking campimetry].
    Damm G, Lachenmayr BJ, Vivell PM.
    Fortschr Ophthalmol; 1991 Dec; 88(6):838-42. PubMed ID: 1794816
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Frequency doubling technology perimetry in open-angle glaucoma eyes with hemifield visual field damage: comparison of high-tension and normal-tension groups.
    Murata H, Tomidokoro A, Matsuo H, Tomita G, Araie M.
    J Glaucoma; 2007 Jan; 16(1):9-13. PubMed ID: 17224743
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Statistical evaluation of the diagnostic accuracy of methods used to determine the progression of visual field defects in glaucoma.
    Mayama C, Araie M, Suzuki Y, Ishida K, Yamamoto T, Kitazawa Y, Shirakashi M, Abe H, Tsukamoto H, Mishima HK, Yoshimura K, Ohashi Y.
    Ophthalmology; 2004 Nov; 111(11):2117-25. PubMed ID: 15522380
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Comparing multifocal VEP and standard automated perimetry in high-risk ocular hypertension and early glaucoma.
    Fortune B, Demirel S, Zhang X, Hood DC, Patterson E, Jamil A, Mansberger SL, Cioffi GA, Johnson CA.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2007 Mar; 48(3):1173-80. PubMed ID: 17325161
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Automated flicker perimetry in glaucoma using Octopus 311: a comparative study with the Humphrey Matrix.
    Matsumoto C, Takada S, Okuyama S, Arimura E, Hashimoto S, Shimomura Y.
    Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2006 Apr; 84(2):210-5. PubMed ID: 16637839
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Blue-on-yellow visual field and retinal nerve fiber layer in ocular hypertension and glaucoma.
    Teesalu P, Airaksinen PJ, Tuulonen A.
    Ophthalmology; 1998 Nov; 105(11):2077-81. PubMed ID: 9818609
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Correlation between intraocular pressure level and optic disc changes in high-tension glaucoma suspects.
    Tanito M, Itai N, Dong J, Ohira A, Chihara E.
    Ophthalmology; 2003 May; 110(5):915-21. PubMed ID: 12750089
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Frequency-doubling perimetry: comparison with standard automated perimetry to detect glaucoma.
    Leeprechanon N, Giangiacomo A, Fontana H, Hoffman D, Caprioli J.
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2007 Feb; 143(2):263-271. PubMed ID: 17178091
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Performance of frequency-doubling technology perimetry in a population-based prevalence survey of glaucoma: the Tajimi study.
    Iwase A, Tomidokoro A, Araie M, Shirato S, Shimizu H, Kitazawa Y, Tajimi Study Group.
    Ophthalmology; 2007 Jan; 114(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 17070580
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. [A comparative analysis of standard automated perimetry and short wavelength automated perimetry in early diagnosis of glaucoma].
    Chiseliţă D, Crenguţa MI, Danielescu C, Mihaela NM.
    Oftalmologia; 2006 Jan; 50(2):94-102. PubMed ID: 16927766
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. The association between glaucomatous visual fields and optic nerve head features in the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study.
    Keltner JL, Johnson CA, Anderson DR, Levine RA, Fan J, Cello KE, Quigley HA, Budenz DL, Parrish RK, Kass MA, Gordon MO, Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study Group.
    Ophthalmology; 2006 Sep; 113(9):1603-12. PubMed ID: 16949445
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Clinical ability of pattern electroretinograms and visual evoked potentials in detecting visual dysfunction in ocular hypertension and glaucoma.
    Parisi V, Miglior S, Manni G, Centofanti M, Bucci MG.
    Ophthalmology; 2006 Feb; 113(2):216-28. PubMed ID: 16406535
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Scanning laser polarimetry using variable corneal compensation in the detection of glaucoma with localized visual field defects.
    Kook MS, Cho HS, Seong M, Choi J.
    Ophthalmology; 2005 Nov; 112(11):1970-8. PubMed ID: 16185765
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Sensitivity and specificity of the 76-suprathreshold visual field test to detect eyes with visual field defect by Humphrey threshold testing in a population-based setting: the Thessaloniki eye study.
    Topouzis F, Coleman AL, Yu F, Mavroudis L, Anastasopoulos E, Koskosas A, Pappas T, Dimitrakos S, Wilson MR.
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2004 Mar; 137(3):420-5. PubMed ID: 15013863
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. [Poly-static quantitative perimetry for detection of open angle glaucoma].
    Lai Z, Lao Y, Ai F.
    Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2000 Mar; 36(2):129-30. PubMed ID: 11853601
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.