These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

679 related items for PubMed ID: 7726040

  • 1. Dual-phase helical CT of the liver: value of arterial phase scans in the detection of small (< or = 1.5 cm) malignant hepatic neoplasms.
    Hollett MD, Jeffrey RB, Nino-Murcia M, Jorgensen MJ, Harris DP.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Apr; 164(4):879-84. PubMed ID: 7726040
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Detecting hepatocellular carcinoma: value of unenhanced or arterial phase CT imaging or both used in conjunction with conventional portal venous phase contrast-enhanced CT imaging.
    Oliver JH, Baron RL, Federle MP, Rockette HE.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Jul; 167(1):71-7. PubMed ID: 8659425
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. CT of hypervascular hepatic tumors: are unenhanced scans necessary for diagnosis?
    Patten RM, Byun JY, Freeny PC.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Nov; 161(5):979-84. PubMed ID: 8273641
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Patient-tailored scan delay for multiphase liver CT: improved scan quality and lesion conspicuity with a novel timing bolus method.
    Schneider JG, Wang ZJ, Wang W, Yee J, Fu Y, Yeh BM.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Feb; 202(2):318-23. PubMed ID: 24450671
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. [The value of different spiral CT phases in the detection of liver metastases].
    Portugaller HR, Stacher R, Komaz G, Aschauer M, Hausegger KA, Szolar DH.
    Rofo; 2002 Apr; 174(4):452-8. PubMed ID: 11960408
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. [Multiple-phase spiral computerized tomography of small hepatocellular carcinoma: technique optimization and diagnostic yield].
    Catalano O, Cusati B, Sandomenico F, Nunziata A, Lobianco R, Siani A.
    Radiol Med; 1999 Apr; 98(1-2):53-64. PubMed ID: 10566297
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Conspicuity of hepatic metastases on helical CT: effect of different time delays between contrast administration and scanning.
    Silverman PM, O'Malley J, Tefft MC, Cooper C, Zeman RK.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Mar; 164(3):619-23. PubMed ID: 7863882
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Dual-energy liver CT: effect of monochromatic imaging on lesion detection, conspicuity, and contrast-to-noise ratio of hypervascular lesions on late arterial phase.
    Shuman WP, Green DE, Busey JM, Mitsumori LM, Choi E, Koprowicz KM, Kanal KM.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Sep; 203(3):601-6. PubMed ID: 25148163
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 34.