These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

242 related items for PubMed ID: 7734531

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Current status of digital projectional radiography of the chest.
    Aberle DR, Hansell D, Huang HK.
    J Thorac Imaging; 1990 Jan; 5(1):10-20. PubMed ID: 2299698
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Dose reduction in patients undergoing chest imaging: digital amorphous silicon flat-panel detector radiography versus conventional film-screen radiography and phosphor-based computed radiography.
    Bacher K, Smeets P, Bonnarens K, De Hauwere A, Verstraete K, Thierens H.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Oct; 181(4):923-9. PubMed ID: 14500203
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. High-resolution digital imaging with storage phosphors.
    Fuhrman CR, Gur D, Schaetzing R.
    J Thorac Imaging; 1990 Jan; 5(1):21-30. PubMed ID: 2299699
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. [Digital thoracic radiography--a comparison of digital and analog imaging techniques].
    Busch HP.
    Bildgebung; 1991 Jan; 58 Suppl 1():9-12. PubMed ID: 1799858
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Productivity and cost assessment of computed radiography, digital radiography, and screen-film for outpatient chest examinations.
    Andriole KP.
    J Digit Imaging; 2002 Sep; 15(3):161-9. PubMed ID: 12532253
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. [New imaging methods in thoracic diagnosis. A study to evaluate digital storage screen radiography, the slit technique ("AMBER"), asymmetric ("InSight") and conventional film-screen techniques].
    Lehmann KJ, Busch HP, Drescher P, Loose R, Georgi M.
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1993 Jan; 3(1):14-9. PubMed ID: 8448224
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Clinical aspects of direct digital mammography.
    Parkin GJ.
    J Digit Imaging; 1995 Feb; 8(1 Suppl 1):61-6. PubMed ID: 7734542
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Chest image quality: film-screen vs. computed radiography.
    Freedman M.
    Adm Radiol; 1991 Jul; 10(7):38-40, 42. PubMed ID: 10170769
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Digital radiography: comparison of different methods for imaging of the thorax and the gastrointestinal tracts.
    Busch HP.
    J Digit Imaging; 1995 Feb; 8(1 Suppl 1):8-10. PubMed ID: 7734546
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. New techniques in chest radiography.
    Glazer HS, Muka E, Sagel SS, Jost RG.
    Radiol Clin North Am; 1994 Jul; 32(4):711-29. PubMed ID: 8022976
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. [An economic comparison between digital luminescence radiography and conventional film processing in intensive care medicine].
    Peters PE, Dykstra DE, Wiesmann W, Schlüchtermann J, Adam D.
    Radiologe; 1992 Nov; 32(11):536-40. PubMed ID: 1461981
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 13.