These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Comparison of six systems for the identification of Enterobacteriaceae. Mastroeni P, Carbone M, Fera MT, Teti G. G Batteriol Virol Immunol; 1983; 76(1-6):3-19. PubMed ID: 6383930 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical comparison of the enterotube II and API 20E systems for bacterial identification. Leighton PM, Little JA. Am J Clin Pathol; 1983 Mar; 79(3):367-70. PubMed ID: 6338701 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Reevaluation of the API 20E identification system versus conventional biochemicals for identification of members of the family Enterobacteriaceae: a new look at an old product. O'Hara CM, Rhoden DL, Miller JM. J Clin Microbiol; 1992 Jan; 30(1):123-5. PubMed ID: 1734043 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of the API rapid E four-hour system with the API 20E overnight system for the identification of routine clinical isolates of the family Enterobacteriaceae. Overman TL, Plumley D, Overman SB, Goodman NL. J Clin Microbiol; 1985 Apr; 21(4):542-5. PubMed ID: 3886691 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of the Sensititre system for identification of Enterobacteriaceae. Staneck JL, Vincelette J, Lamothe F, Polk EA. J Clin Microbiol; 1983 Apr; 17(4):647-54. PubMed ID: 6343422 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of micro-ID and API 20E in rapid identification of Enterobacteriaceae. Gooch WM, Hill GA. J Clin Microbiol; 1982 May; 15(5):885-90. PubMed ID: 7047556 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]