These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
25. The Norton score and pressure sore prevention. Critique. Waterlow J, Vernon MJ, Bennett G, Gilchrist B. J Wound Care; 1996 Feb; 5(2):93-9. PubMed ID: 8697139 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. An interrater reliability study of the Braden scale in two nursing homes. Kottner J, Dassen T. Int J Nurs Stud; 2008 Oct; 45(10):1501-11. PubMed ID: 18395726 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Skin assessment and pressure ulcer care in hospital-based skilled nursing facilities. Siem CA, Wipke-Tevis DD, Rantz MJ, Popejoy LL. Ostomy Wound Manage; 2003 Jun; 49(6):42-4, 46, 48 passim, contd. PubMed ID: 12874483 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. [Evaluating the risks of pressure ulcers. The Braden scale]. Torra i Bou JE. Rev Enferm; 1997 Apr; 20(224):22-30. PubMed ID: 9220862 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Developing a pressure ulcer risk assessment scale for patients in long-term care. Lepisto M, Eriksson E, Hietanen H, Lepisto J, Lauri S. Ostomy Wound Manage; 2006 Feb; 52(2):34-46. PubMed ID: 16464993 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Validity and reliability of the Pressure Sore Status Tool. Bates-Jensen BM, Vredevoe DL, Brecht ML. Decubitus; 1992 Nov; 5(6):20-8. PubMed ID: 1489512 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Computer-based testing of the Braden Scale for Predicting Pressure Sore Risk. Maklebust J, Sieggreen MY, Sidor D, Gerlach MA, Bauer C, Anderson C. Ostomy Wound Manage; 2005 Apr; 51(4):40-2, 44, 46 passim. PubMed ID: 16089059 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Assessing the risk of pressure sores. Bridel J. Nurs Stand; 2005 Apr; 7(25):32-5. PubMed ID: 8471493 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Interrater reliability using Modified Norton Scale, Pressure Ulcer Card, Short Form-Mini Nutritional Assessment by registered and enrolled nurses in clinical practice. Bååth C, Hall-Lord ML, Idvall E, Wiberg-Hedman K, Wilde Larsson B. J Clin Nurs; 2008 Mar; 17(5):618-26. PubMed ID: 18279294 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. [The Braden Scale--validity and reliability of a measuring tool for decubitus risk factors]. Beekman EP, Timmermans PP, Halfens RJ. Verpleegkunde; 1996 Nov; 11(4):205-14. PubMed ID: 9516819 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Nursing home quality and pressure ulcer prevention and management practices. Wipke-Tevis DD, Williams DA, Rantz MJ, Popejoy LL, Madsen RW, Petroski GF, Vogelsmeier AA. J Am Geriatr Soc; 2004 Apr; 52(4):583-8. PubMed ID: 15066075 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Clinical utility of the Braden scale for Predicting Pressure Sore Risk. Braden BJ, Bergstrom N. Decubitus; 1989 Aug; 2(3):44-6, 50-1. PubMed ID: 2775473 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Pressure injury risk assessment in intensive care: comparison of inter-rater reliability of the COMHON (Conscious level, Mobility, Haemodynamics, Oxygenation, Nutrition) Index with three scales. Fulbrook P, Anderson A. J Adv Nurs; 2016 Mar; 72(3):680-92. PubMed ID: 26462998 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]