These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

184 related items for PubMed ID: 7774771

  • 1. Event-related potentials and the categorical perception of speech sounds.
    Maiste AC, Wiens AS, Hunt MJ, Scherg M, Picton TW.
    Ear Hear; 1995 Feb; 16(1):68-90. PubMed ID: 7774771
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Neural Correlates of Phonetic Learning in Postlingually Deafened Cochlear Implant Listeners.
    Miller S, Zhang Y, Nelson P.
    Ear Hear; 2016 Feb; 37(5):514-28. PubMed ID: 26928002
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Acoustic versus phonetic representation of speech as reflected by the mismatch negativity event-related potential.
    Sharma A, Kraus N, McGee T, Carrell T, Nicol T.
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1993 Feb; 88(1):64-71. PubMed ID: 7681392
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. N1 response attenuation and the mismatch negativity (MMN) to within- and across-category phonetic contrasts.
    Silva DM, Melges DB, Rothe-Neves R.
    Psychophysiology; 2017 Apr; 54(4):591-600. PubMed ID: 28169421
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Effects of low-pass noise masking on auditory event-related potentials to speech.
    Martin BA, Stapells DR.
    Ear Hear; 2005 Apr; 26(2):195-213. PubMed ID: 15809545
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Electrophysiological and phonological change detection measures of auditory word processing in normal Persian-speaking children.
    Ziatabar Ahmadi SZ, Mahmoudian S, Ashayeri H, Allaeddini F, Farhadi M.
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2016 Nov; 90():220-226. PubMed ID: 27729137
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Preattentive cortical-evoked responses to pure tones, harmonic tones, and speech: influence of music training.
    Nikjeh DA, Lister JJ, Frisch SA.
    Ear Hear; 2009 Aug; 30(4):432-46. PubMed ID: 19494778
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Cortical auditory evoked potential correlates of categorical perception of voice-onset time.
    Sharma A, Dorman MF.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Aug; 106(2):1078-83. PubMed ID: 10462812
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. The effects of decreased audibility produced by high-pass noise masking on N1 and the mismatch negativity to speech sounds /ba/and/da.
    Martin BA, Kurtzberg D, Stapells DR.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 1999 Apr; 42(2):271-86. PubMed ID: 10229446
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Mismatch negativity to acoustic differences not differentiated behaviorally.
    Dalebout SD, Stack JW.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1999 Apr; 10(7):388-99. PubMed ID: 10949943
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Event-related brain potentials and the perception of a phonetic continuum.
    Aaltonen O, Niemi P, Nyrke T, Tuhkanen M.
    Biol Psychol; 1987 Jun; 24(3):197-207. PubMed ID: 3663795
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Mismatch negativity reflects sensory and phonetic speech processing.
    Joanisse MF, Robertson EK, Newman RL.
    Neuroreport; 2007 Jun 11; 18(9):901-5. PubMed ID: 17515798
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. The effect of visual task difficulty and attentional direction on the detection of acoustic change as indexed by the Mismatch Negativity.
    Muller-Gass A, Stelmack RM, Campbell KB.
    Brain Res; 2006 Mar 17; 1078(1):112-30. PubMed ID: 16497283
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Differences in sensory processing of German vowels and physically matched non-speech sounds as revealed by the mismatch negativity (MMN) of the human event-related brain potential (ERP).
    Christmann CA, Berti S, Steinbrink C, Lachmann T.
    Brain Lang; 2014 Sep 17; 136():8-18. PubMed ID: 25108306
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. The habituation of event-related potentials to speech sounds and tones.
    Woods DL, Elmasian R.
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1986 Nov 17; 65(6):447-59. PubMed ID: 2429824
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. The intensity of masking noise affects the mismatch negativity to speech sounds in human subjects.
    Muller-Gass A, Marcoux A, Logan J, Campbell KB.
    Neurosci Lett; 2001 Feb 23; 299(3):197-200. PubMed ID: 11165769
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Neurophysiological indices of speech and nonspeech stimulus processing.
    Tampas JW, Harkrider AW, Hedrick MS.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2005 Oct 23; 48(5):1147-64. PubMed ID: 16411803
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Cerebral generators of mismatch negativity (MMN) and its magnetic counterpart (MMNm) elicited by sound changes.
    Alho K.
    Ear Hear; 1995 Feb 23; 16(1):38-51. PubMed ID: 7774768
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Phonological memory traces do not contain phonetic information.
    Rhodes R, Han C, Hestvik A.
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 May 23; 81(4):897-911. PubMed ID: 30989583
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 10.