These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
7. Simultaneous implantation of St. Jude Medical aortic and mitral prostheses. Armenti F, Stephenson LW, Edmunds LH. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1987 Nov; 94(5):733-9. PubMed ID: 3669701 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. More than ten years' follow-up of the Hancock porcine bioprosthesis in Japan. Kawachi Y, Tanaka J, Tominaga R, Kinoshita K, Tokunaga K. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1992 Jul; 104(1):5-13. PubMed ID: 1614215 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical outcome after isolated tricuspid valve replacement: 20-year experience. Do QB, Pellerin M, Carrier M, Cartier R, Hébert Y, Pagé P, Perrault LP, Pelletier LC. Can J Cardiol; 2000 Apr; 16(4):489-93. PubMed ID: 10787464 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [Tricuspid valve replacements in adults. Long-term results]. Nataf P, Chanton E, Vernhet JC, Regan M, Chenik S, Dorent R, Jault F, Pavie A, Cabrol C, Gandjbakhch I. Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss; 1993 Sep; 86(9):1325-30. PubMed ID: 8129549 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Early and late phase events following bioprosthetic tricuspid valve replacement. McGrath LB, Chen C, Bailey BM, Fernandez J, Laub GW, Adkins MS. J Card Surg; 1992 Sep; 7(3):245-53. PubMed ID: 1392233 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Is a bioprosthesis preferable in tricuspid valve replacement? Hayashi J, Saito A, Yamamoto K, Watanabe H, Ohzeki H, Eguchi S. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1996 Oct; 44(5):230-3. PubMed ID: 8948549 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Which type of valve should we use in tricuspid position? Long-term comparison between mechanical and biological valves. Redondo Palacios A, López Menéndez J, Miguelena Hycka J, Martín García M, Varela Barca L, Ferreiro Marzal A, Muñoz Pérez R, Oliva de Anquín E, García Andrade I, Centella Hernández T, Celemín Canorea D, Rodríguez-Roda Stuart J. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino); 2017 Oct; 58(5):739-746. PubMed ID: 27636399 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Long-term clinical results of tricuspid valve replacement. Chang BC, Lim SH, Yi G, Hong YS, Lee S, Yoo KJ, Kang MS, Cho BK. Ann Thorac Surg; 2006 Apr; 81(4):1317-23, discussion 1323-4. PubMed ID: 16564264 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Durability of bioprostheses for the tricuspid valve in patients with congenital heart disease. Burri M, Vogt MO, Hörer J, Cleuziou J, Kasnar-Samprec J, Kühn A, Lange R, Schreiber C. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2016 Nov; 50(5):988-993. PubMed ID: 27005978 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Excellent durability of the Hancock porcine bioprosthesis in the tricuspid position. A sixteen-year follow-up study. Kawachi Y, Tominaga R, Hisahara M, Nakashima A, Yasui H, Tokunaga K. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1992 Dec; 104(6):1561-6. PubMed ID: 1453721 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Surgery for tricuspid regurgitation late after mitral valve replacement. King RM, Schaff HV, Danielson GK, Gersh BJ, Orszulak TA, Piehler JM, Puga FJ, Pluth JR. Circulation; 1984 Sep; 70(3 Pt 2):I193-7. PubMed ID: 6744564 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Minimally invasive tricuspid valve surgery in patients at high risk. Ricci D, Boffini M, Barbero C, El Qarra S, Marchetto G, Rinaldi M. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2014 Mar; 147(3):996-1001. PubMed ID: 23623618 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]