These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

427 related items for PubMed ID: 7778636

  • 1. A comparison of misoprostol and prostaglandin E2 gel for preinduction cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Wing DA, Jones MM, Rahall A, Goodwin TM, Paul RH.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Jun; 172(6):1804-10. PubMed ID: 7778636
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Misoprostol: an effective agent for cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Wing DA, Rahall A, Jones MM, Goodwin TM, Paul RH.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Jun; 172(6):1811-6. PubMed ID: 7778637
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. A comparison of intermittent vaginal administration of misoprostol with continuous dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Wing DA, Ortiz-Omphroy G, Paul RH.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Sep; 177(3):612-8. PubMed ID: 9322632
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. A comparison of differing dosing regimens of vaginally administered misoprostol for preinduction cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Wing DA, Paul RH.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1996 Jul; 175(1):158-64. PubMed ID: 8694043
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. A comparison of intravaginal misoprostol and intracervical prostaglandin E2 gel for ripening of unfavorable cervix and labor induction.
    Herabutya Y, O-Prasertsawat P, Pokpirom J.
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 1997 Aug; 23(4):369-74. PubMed ID: 9311179
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Induction of labor with misoprostol for premature rupture of membranes beyond thirty-six weeks' gestation.
    Wing DA, Paul RH.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1998 Jul; 179(1):94-9. PubMed ID: 9704771
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Randomized comparison of misoprostol and dinoprostone for preinduction cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Chang CH, Chang FM.
    J Formos Med Assoc; 1997 May; 96(5):366-9. PubMed ID: 9170825
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. A comparison of orally administered misoprostol with vaginally administered misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Wing DA, Ham D, Paul RH.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1999 May; 180(5):1155-60. PubMed ID: 10329871
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Misoprostol is more efficacious for labor induction than prostaglandin E2, but is it associated with more risk?
    Kolderup L, McLean L, Grullon K, Safford K, Kilpatrick SJ.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Jun; 180(6 Pt 1):1543-50. PubMed ID: 10368502
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Randomized comparison between intravaginal misoprostol and dinoprostone for cervical ripening and induction of labor.
    Nunes F, Rodrigues R, Meirinho M.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Sep; 181(3):626-9. PubMed ID: 10486474
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Six hourly vaginal misoprostol versus intracervical dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Agarwal N, Gupta A, Kriplani A, Bhatla N, Parul.
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2003 Jun; 29(3):147-51. PubMed ID: 12841697
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Use of misoprostol for cervical ripening.
    Katz VL, Farmer RM, Dean CA, Carpenter ME.
    South Med J; 2000 Sep; 93(9):881-4. PubMed ID: 11005347
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Cervical ripening: a randomized comparison between intravaginal misoprostol and an intracervical balloon catheter combined with intravaginal dinoprostone.
    Perry KG, Larmon JE, May WL, Robinette LG, Martin RW.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1998 Jun; 178(6):1333-40. PubMed ID: 9662319
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Labor induction with prostaglandin E1 misoprostol compared with dinoprostone vaginal insert: a randomized trial.
    Sanchez-Ramos L, Peterson DE, Delke I, Gaudier FL, Kaunitz AM.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1998 Mar; 91(3):401-5. PubMed ID: 9491868
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Intracervical misoprostol and prostaglandin E2 for labor induction.
    Chang YK, Chen WH, Yu MH, Liu HS.
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2003 Jan; 80(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 12527456
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Comparative efficacy and safety of vaginal misoprostol versus dinoprostone vaginal insert in labor induction at term: a randomized trial.
    Ozkan S, Calişkan E, Doğer E, Yücesoy I, Ozeren S, Vural B.
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2009 Jul; 280(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 19034471
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Randomized trial of two doses of the prostaglandin E1 analog misoprostol for labor induction.
    Farah LA, Sanchez-Ramos L, Rosa C, Del Valle GO, Gaudier FL, Delke I, Kaunitz AM.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Aug; 177(2):364-9; discussion 369-71. PubMed ID: 9290452
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Outpatient misoprostol compared with dinoprostone gel for preinduction cervical ripening: a randomized controlled trial.
    Meyer M, Pflum J, Howard D.
    Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Mar; 105(3):466-72. PubMed ID: 15738009
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Oral misoprostol vs. intravaginal prostaglandin E2 for preinduction cervical ripening. A randomized trial.
    Gherman RB, Browning J, O'Boyle A, Goodwin TM.
    J Reprod Med; 2001 Jul; 46(7):641-6. PubMed ID: 11499184
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Comparison of the safety and efficacy of intravaginal misoprostol (prostaglandin E1) with those of dinoprostone (prostaglandin E2) for cervical ripening and induction of labor in a community hospital.
    Blanchette HA, Nayak S, Erasmus S.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Jun; 180(6 Pt 1):1551-9. PubMed ID: 10368503
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 22.