These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

107 related items for PubMed ID: 7782529

  • 1. Bacterial adhesion to dental amalgam and three resin composites.
    Suljak JP, Reid G, Wood SM, McConnell RJ, van der Mei HC, Busscher HJ.
    J Dent; 1995 Jun; 23(3):171-6. PubMed ID: 7782529
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Influence of surface roughness on streptococcal adhesion forces to composite resins.
    Mei L, Busscher HJ, van der Mei HC, Ren Y.
    Dent Mater; 2011 Aug; 27(8):770-8. PubMed ID: 21524789
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Oral bacterial adhesion forces to biomaterial surfaces constituting the bracket-adhesive-enamel junction in orthodontic treatment.
    Mei L, Busscher HJ, van der Mei HC, Chen Y, de Vries J, Ren Y.
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2009 Aug; 117(4):419-26. PubMed ID: 19627354
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Bacterial viability on surface-modified resin-based dental restorative materials.
    Rüttermann S, Bergmann N, Beikler T, Raab WH, Janda R.
    Arch Oral Biol; 2012 Nov; 57(11):1512-21. PubMed ID: 22673754
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Immediate repair bond strengths of microhybrid, nanohybrid and nanofilled composites after different surface treatments.
    Rinastiti M, Ozcan M, Siswomihardjo W, Busscher HJ.
    J Dent; 2010 Jan; 38(1):29-38. PubMed ID: 19735692
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Biofilm formation on restorative materials and resin composite cements.
    Astasov-Frauenhoffer M, Glauser S, Fischer J, Schmidli F, Waltimo T, Rohr N.
    Dent Mater; 2018 Nov; 34(11):1702-1709. PubMed ID: 30220506
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. The effect of amalgam surface preparation on the shear bond strength between composite and amalgam.
    Ruse ND, Sekimoto RT, Feduik D.
    Oper Dent; 1995 Nov; 20(5):180-5. PubMed ID: 8710696
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. The influence of long term water immersion on shear bond strength of amalgam repaired by resin composite and mediated by adhesives or resin modified glass ionomers.
    Pilo R, Nissan J, Shafir H, Shapira G, Alter E, Brosh T.
    J Dent; 2012 Jul; 40(7):594-602. PubMed ID: 22504527
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Streptococcal adhesion to novel low-shrink silorane-based restorative.
    Buergers R, Schneider-Brachert W, Hahnel S, Rosentritt M, Handel G.
    Dent Mater; 2009 Feb; 25(2):269-75. PubMed ID: 18768217
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Saliva mediated adherence, aggregation and prevalence in dental plaque of Streptococcus mutans, Streptococcus sanguis and Actinomyces spp, in young and elderly humans.
    Carlén A, Olsson J, Ramberg P.
    Arch Oral Biol; 1996 Dec; 41(12):1133-40. PubMed ID: 9134102
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. The effect of surface conditioning on the bond strength of resin composite to amalgam.
    Blum IR, Hafiana K, Curtis A, Barbour ME, Attin T, Lynch CD, Jagger DC.
    J Dent; 2012 Jan; 40(1):15-21. PubMed ID: 22100436
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. In vitro bacterial adherence onto pellicle-coated aesthetic restorative materials.
    Shahal Y, Steinberg D, Hirschfeld Z, Bronshteyn M, Kopolovic K.
    J Oral Rehabil; 1998 Jan; 25(1):52-8. PubMed ID: 9502127
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Shear bond strength of composite resin and amalgam adhesive systems to dentin.
    Evans DB, Neme AM.
    Am J Dent; 1999 Feb; 12(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 10477994
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Use of self-curing composite resins to facilitate amalgam repair.
    Lacy AM, Rupprecht R, Watanabe L.
    Quintessence Int; 1992 Jan; 23(1):53-9. PubMed ID: 1631271
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Early formation of Streptococcus sobrinus biofilm on various dental restorative materials.
    Steinberg D, Eyal S.
    J Dent; 2002 Jan; 30(1):47-51. PubMed ID: 11741735
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. An in vitro quantitative antibacterial analysis of amalgam and composite resins.
    Beyth N, Domb AJ, Weiss EI.
    J Dent; 2007 Mar; 35(3):201-6. PubMed ID: 16996674
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. In vitro colonisation of acrylic resin denture base materials by Streptococcus oralis and Actinomyces viscosus.
    Kagermeier-Callaway AS, Willershausen B, Frank T, Stender E.
    Int Dent J; 2000 Apr; 50(2):79-85. PubMed ID: 10945186
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Biofilm-induced changes to the composite surface.
    Nedeljkovic I, De Munck J, Ungureanu AA, Slomka V, Bartic C, Vananroye A, Clasen C, Teughels W, Van Meerbeek B, Van Landuyt KL.
    J Dent; 2017 Aug; 63():36-43. PubMed ID: 28554609
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. The influence of saliva on interbacterial adherence.
    Skopek RJ, Liljemark WF.
    Oral Microbiol Immunol; 1994 Feb; 9(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 7478750
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Streptococcal adherence to uncoated and saliva-coated restoratives.
    Satou J, Fukunaga A, Morikawa A, Matsumae I, Satou N, Shintani H.
    J Oral Rehabil; 1991 Sep; 18(5):421-9. PubMed ID: 1839312
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 6.