These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
107 related items for PubMed ID: 7782529
21. Support of undermined occlusal enamel provided by restorative materials. Latino C, Troendle K, Summitt JB. Quintessence Int; 2001 Apr; 32(4):287-91. PubMed ID: 12066648 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Resistance to condensation of 'condensable' resin composites as evaluated by a mechanical test. Brackett WW, Covey DA. Oper Dent; 2000 Apr; 25(5):424-6. PubMed ID: 11203851 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. The color differences between different thicknesses of resin veneered over amalgam. Al-Jazairy YH, El-Hejazi AA. J Contemp Dent Pract; 2005 Nov 15; 6(4):38-45. PubMed ID: 16299605 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Detection of leached moieties from dental composites in fluids simulating food and saliva. Lee SY, Greener EH, Menis DL. Dent Mater; 1995 Nov 15; 11(6):348-53. PubMed ID: 8595834 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Antibacterial properties of dentin bonding systems, polyacid-modified composite resins and composite resins. Karanika-Kouma A, Dionysopoulos P, Koliniotou-Koubia E, Kolokotronis A. J Oral Rehabil; 2001 Feb 15; 28(2):157-60. PubMed ID: 11298264 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Surface characteristics of orthodontic adhesives and effects on streptococcal adhesion. Ahn SJ, Lim BS, Lee SJ. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Apr 15; 137(4):489-95; discussion 13A. PubMed ID: 20362908 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Adherence of Streptococcus mutans to uncoated and saliva-coated glass-ceramics and composites. Kantorski KZ, Scotti R, Valandro LF, Bottino MA, Koga-Ito CY, Jorge AO. Gen Dent; 2008 Apr 15; 56(7):740-7; quiz 748-9, 768. PubMed ID: 19014037 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Bacterial colonization on titanium, hydroxyapatite, and amalgam surfaces in vivo. Leonhardt A, Olsson J, Dahlén G. J Dent Res; 1995 Sep 15; 74(9):1607-12. PubMed ID: 7560424 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. A comparison of the marginal and internal adaptation of amalgam and resin composite restorations in small to moderate-sized Class II preparations of conventional design. Duncalf WV, Wilson NH. Quintessence Int; 2000 May 15; 31(5):347-52. PubMed ID: 11203946 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Effect of acidulated phosphate fluoride (APF) gel on the adherence of cariogenic bacteria to resin composites. Kim YJ, Jang KT, García-Godoy F. Am J Dent; 2005 Apr 15; 18(2):91-4. PubMed ID: 15973825 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. In situ evaluation of a new silorane-based composite resin's bioadhesion properties. Claro-Pereira D, Sampaio-Maia B, Ferreira C, Rodrigues A, Melo LF, Vasconcelos MR. Dent Mater; 2011 Dec 15; 27(12):1238-45. PubMed ID: 22005004 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Accumulation of Streptococcus mutans on light-cured composites and amalgam: an in vitro study. Zalkind MM, Keisar O, Ever-Hadani P, Grinberg R, Sela MN. J Esthet Dent; 1998 Dec 15; 10(4):187-90. PubMed ID: 9893513 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Curing units' ability to cure restorative composites and dual-cured composite cements under composite overlay. Park SH, Kim SS, Cho YS, Lee CK, Noh BD. Oper Dent; 2004 Dec 15; 29(6):627-35. PubMed ID: 15646217 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. The effect of three polishing systems on the surface roughness of four hybrid composites: a profilometric and scanning electron microscopy study. Kaplan BA, Goldstein GR, Vijayaraghavan TV, Nelson IK. J Prosthet Dent; 1996 Jul 15; 76(1):34-8. PubMed ID: 8814632 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Comparison of retentiveness of amalgam bonding agent types. Winkler MM, Moore BK, Allen J, Rhodes B. Oper Dent; 1997 Jul 15; 22(5):200-8. PubMed ID: 9484142 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]