These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

138 related items for PubMed ID: 778303

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Comparative in vitro activity of three cephalosporins against Staphylococcus aureus isolated from bovine mastitis.
    Lopes CA, Moreno G.
    Res Vet Sci; 1991 Nov; 51(3):339-40. PubMed ID: 1780593
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Differences between cephalothin and newer parenterally absorbed cephalosporins in vitro: a justification for separate disks.
    Washington JA II.
    J Infect Dis; 1978 May; 137 Suppl():S32-S37. PubMed ID: 349096
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. [In vitro susceptibility of bacteroidaceae to cefoxitin and cephalothin (author's transl)].
    Werner H, Firsching R, Krasemann C.
    Infection; 1977 May; 5(1):13-6. PubMed ID: 856727
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. In vitro studies of cefamandole.
    Bodey GP, Weaver S.
    Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1976 Mar; 9(3):452-7. PubMed ID: 769679
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Comparative activity of two newer cephalosporins, cefoxitin, and cephalothin against selected Enterobacteriaceae and correlation with enzymatic resistance mechanisms.
    Vuye A, Pijck J, Van Landuyt HW.
    J Antimicrob Chemother; 1979 May; 5(3):293-300. PubMed ID: 314440
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. A comparison of the in vitro activity of cefoxitin and cephalothin against 7,312 clinical isolates.
    Lingaas E, Midtvedt T, Melby K, Dahl OU.
    Chemotherapy; 1981 May; 27(4):239-46. PubMed ID: 7249786
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Cefoxitin, a new semi-synthetic cephamycin: an in-vitro and in-vivo comparison with cephalothin.
    Kosmidis J, Hamilton-Miller JM, Gilchrist JN, Kerry DW, Brumfitt W.
    Br Med J; 1973 Dec 15; 4(5893):653-5. PubMed ID: 4202265
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Comparative in vitro activity of cephalosporins.
    Stewart D, Bodey GP.
    J Antibiot (Tokyo); 1976 Feb 15; 29(2):181-6. PubMed ID: 6411
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.