These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

148 related items for PubMed ID: 7797418

  • 1. Conventional film-screen versus computed storage phosphor radiography. Simulated miliary lung disease in an anthropomorphic phantom.
    Mosser H, Pärtan G, Urban M, Krampla W, Ottes F, Hruby W.
    Invest Radiol; 1995 Mar; 30(3):186-91. PubMed ID: 7797418
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Selenium radiography versus storage phosphor and conventional radiography in the detection of simulated chest lesions.
    Schaefer-Prokop CM, Prokop M, Schmidt A, Neitzel U, Galanski M.
    Radiology; 1996 Oct; 201(1):45-50. PubMed ID: 8816519
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Interpretation of subtle interstitial chest abnormalities: conventional radiography versus high-resolution storage-phosphor radiography--a preliminary study.
    Ikezoe J, Kohno N, Kido S, Takeuchi N, Johkoh T, Arisawa J, Kozuka T.
    J Digit Imaging; 1995 Feb; 8(1 Suppl 1):31-6. PubMed ID: 7734537
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Effects of reduced exposure on computed radiography: comparison of nodule detection accuracy with conventional and asymmetric screen-film radiographs of a chest phantom.
    Kimme-Smith C, Aberle DR, Sayre JW, Hart EM, Greaves SM, Brown K, Young DA, Deseran MD, Johnson T, Johnson SL.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Aug; 165(2):269-73. PubMed ID: 7618538
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Experimental evaluation of a portable indirect flat-panel detector for the pediatric chest: comparison with storage phosphor radiography at different exposures by using a chest phantom.
    Rapp-Bernhardt U, Bernhardt TM, Lenzen H, Esseling R, Roehl FW, Schiborr M, Theobald-Hormann I, Heindel W.
    Radiology; 2005 Nov; 237(2):485-91. PubMed ID: 16170012
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Detection of simulated chest lesions: comparison of a conventional screen-film combination, an asymmetric screen-film system, and storage phosphor radiography.
    Leppert AG, Prokop M, Schaefer-Prokop CM, Galanski M.
    Radiology; 1995 Apr; 195(1):259-63. PubMed ID: 7892482
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Effects of optimization and image processing in digital chest radiography: an ROC study with an anthropomorphic phantom.
    Kheddache S, Månsson LG, Angelhed JE, Denbratt L, Gottfridsson B, Schlossman D.
    Eur J Radiol; 1991 Apr; 13(2):143-50. PubMed ID: 1743193
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Phantom study of chest radiography with storage phosphor, selenium, and film-screen systems.
    Kehler M, Lyttkens K, Andersson B, Hochbergs P, Lindberg CG, Medin J, Nordström AJ, Sanfridsson J, Vojciechowski J.
    Acta Radiol; 1996 May; 37(3 Pt 1):332-6. PubMed ID: 8845264
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. ROC-analysis of detection performance by analogue and digital plain film systems in chest radiography.
    Müller RD, Wähling S, Hirche H, Voss M, Blendl C, Gocke C, Gocke P, Buddenbrock B, John V, Wiebringhaus R, Turowski B.
    Acta Radiol; 1996 Nov; 37(6):847-54. PubMed ID: 8995453
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Digital radiography versus conventional radiography in chest imaging: diagnostic performance of a large-area silicon flat-panel detector in a clinical CT-controlled study.
    Garmer M, Hennigs SP, Jäger HJ, Schrick F, van de Loo T, Jacobs A, Hanusch A, Christmann A, Mathias K.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2000 Jan; 174(1):75-80. PubMed ID: 10628458
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Computed radiography versus screen-film mammography in detection of simulated microcalcifications: a receiver operating characteristic study based on phantom images.
    Shaw CC, Wang T, King JL, Breitenstein DS, Chang TS, Harris KM, Baratz AB, Ganott MA, Reginella R, Sumkin JH, Gur D.
    Acad Radiol; 1998 Mar; 5(3):173-80. PubMed ID: 9522883
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Image quality for five modern chest radiography techniques: a modified FROC study with an anthropomorphic chest phantom.
    Månsson LG, Kheddache S, Lanhede B, Tylén U.
    Eur Radiol; 1999 Mar; 9(9):1826-34. PubMed ID: 10602958
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. [Thoracic radiographs with the AMBER system. A comparison of the diagnostic image quality of film-screen and storage-phosphor radiographs on the grid-partition stand and the AMBER system].
    Busch HP, Hartmann J, Freund MC, Lehmann KJ, Georgi M, Richter K.
    Rofo; 1992 Mar; 156(3):241-6. PubMed ID: 1550921
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Storage phosphor versus screen-film radiography: effect of varying exposure parameters and unsharp mask filtering on the detectability of cortical bone defects.
    Prokop M, Galanski M, Oestmann JW, von Falkenhausen U, Rosenthal H, Reimer P, Nischelsky J, Reichelt S.
    Radiology; 1990 Oct; 177(1):109-13. PubMed ID: 2399307
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. A ROC study of AMBER and conventional chest imaging in the detection of simulated interstitial lung disease.
    van Schelven IH, Winter LH, Chakraborty DP, Schultze Kool LJ.
    Eur J Radiol; 1995 Nov; 21(1):67-71. PubMed ID: 8654463
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Interstitial lung disease: impact of postprocessing in digital storage phosphor imaging.
    Schaefer CM, Greene R, Llewellyn HJ, Mrose HE, Pile-Spellman EA, Rubens JR, Lindemann SR.
    Radiology; 1991 Mar; 178(3):733-8. PubMed ID: 1994410
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. [Interstitial lung diseases. A comparative study between a film-screen combination and a digital storage phosphor technic].
    Dölken W, Chowanetz W, Horwitz AE, Krahe T, Landwehr P, Lackner K.
    Rofo; 1992 Jan; 156(1):61-7. PubMed ID: 1733476
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. [Nodular lesions simulated on an anthropomorphic thoracic phantom. A comparison between analog and digital images of the thorax].
    Miceli M, Stamati R, Burci P, Sartoni Galloni S, Guidarelli G, Pastori R.
    Radiol Med; 1993 Jan; 85(1-2):54-8. PubMed ID: 8480049
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Digital chest radiography with a large image intensifier. An ROC study with an anthropomorphic phantom.
    Månsson LG, Kheddache S, Börjesson J, Mattsson S, Schlossman D.
    Eur J Radiol; 1989 Nov; 9(4):208-13. PubMed ID: 2591385
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Unsharp masking of low-dosed digital luminescence radiographs: results of a receiver operating characteristics analysis.
    Müller RD, Voss M, Hirche H, Buddenbrock B, John V, Bosch E.
    Eur Radiol; 1996 Nov; 6(4):526-31. PubMed ID: 8798037
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.