These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

167 related items for PubMed ID: 7797731

  • 1. Comparing the resistance of dentin bonding agents and pins in amalgam restorations.
    Imbery TA, Burgess JO, Batzer RC.
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1995 Jun; 126(6):753-9. PubMed ID: 7797731
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Retention of complex amalgam restorations using self-threading pins, amalgapins, and Amalgambond.
    Imbery TA, Hilton TJ, Reagan SE.
    Am J Dent; 1995 Jun; 8(3):117-21. PubMed ID: 8599585
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Fracture resistance of complex amalgam restorations.
    Burgess JO, Alvarez A, Summitt JB.
    Oper Dent; 1997 Jun; 22(3):128-32. PubMed ID: 9484151
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Fracture resistance of extensive amalgam restorations retained by pins, amalgapins and amalgam bonding agents.
    Imbery TA, Coudron J, Moon PC.
    Oper Dent; 2008 Jun; 33(6):666-74. PubMed ID: 19051860
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Six-year clinical evaluation of bonded and pin-retained complex amalgam restorations.
    Summitt JB, Burgess JO, Berry TG, Robbins JW, Osborne JW, Haveman CW.
    Oper Dent; 2004 Jun; 29(3):261-8. PubMed ID: 15195725
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Strength of amalgam restorations bonded with Amalgambond.
    Ianzano JA, Mastrodomenico J, Gwinnett AJ.
    Am J Dent; 1993 Feb; 6(1):10-2. PubMed ID: 8329154
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Effect of adhesive volume on the bond strength of bonded complex amalgam restorations.
    Overton JD, Vance RI.
    Am J Dent; 2005 Dec; 18(6):320-2. PubMed ID: 16433399
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Effect of restoration size on fracture resistance of bonded amalgam restorations.
    Lindemuth JS, Hagge MS, Broome JS.
    Oper Dent; 2000 Dec; 25(3):177-81. PubMed ID: 11203813
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. The performance of bonded vs. pin-retained complex amalgam restorations: a five-year clinical evaluation.
    Summitt JB, Burgess JO, Berry TG, Robbins JW, Osborne JW, Haveman CW.
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2001 Jul; 132(7):923-31. PubMed ID: 11480646
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Effect of bonded amalgam restorations on microleakage.
    Al-Jazairy YH, Louka AN.
    Oper Dent; 1999 Jul; 24(4):203-9. PubMed ID: 10823065
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. In vitro evaluation of the use of resin liners to reduce microleakage and improve retention of amalgam restorations.
    Charlton DG, Moore BK, Swartz ML.
    Oper Dent; 1992 Jul; 17(3):112-9. PubMed ID: 1437693
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Adhesive liner incorporation in dental amalgam restorations.
    Boston DW.
    Quintessence Int; 1997 Jan; 28(1):49-55. PubMed ID: 10332355
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Mechanical versus chemical retention for restoring complex restorations: what is the evidence?
    Vaught RL.
    J Dent Educ; 2007 Oct; 71(10):1356-62. PubMed ID: 17923714
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Bonded amalgam restorations: using a glass-ionomer as an adhesive liner.
    Chen RS, Liu CC, Cheng MR, Lin CP.
    Oper Dent; 2000 Oct; 25(5):411-7. PubMed ID: 11203849
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.