These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


265 related items for PubMed ID: 7799199

  • 21. Use of levonorgestrel implants versus oral contraceptives in adolescence: a case-control study.
    Berenson AB, Wiemann CM.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Apr; 172(4 Pt 1):1128-35; discussion 1135-7. PubMed ID: 7726249
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. The performance of levonorgestrel rod and Norplant contraceptive implants: a 5 year randomized study.
    Sivin I, Campodonico I, Kiriwat O, Holma P, Diaz S, Wan L, Biswas A, Viegas O, el din Abdalla K, Anant MP, Pavez M, Stern J.
    Hum Reprod; 1998 Dec; 13(12):3371-8. PubMed ID: 9886517
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Condom practices of urban teens using Norplant contraceptive implants, oral contraceptives, and condoms for contraception.
    Darney PD, Callegari LS, Swift A, Atkinson ES, Robert AM.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Apr; 180(4):929-37. PubMed ID: 10203661
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Hormonal implants: contraception for a new century.
    Darney PD.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1994 May; 170(5 Pt 2):1536-43. PubMed ID: 8178903
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Return of fertility following discontinuation of Norplant-II subdermal implants. ICMR Task Force on Hormonal Contraception.
    Buckshee K, Chatterjee P, Dhall GI, Hazra MN, Kodkany BS, Lalitha K, Logambal A, Manchanda P, Nanda UK, RaiChoudhury G.
    Contraception; 1995 Apr; 51(4):237-42. PubMed ID: 7796589
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Continuation rates of long-acting methods of contraception. A comparative study of Norplant implants and intrauterine devices.
    Fleming D, Davie J, Glasier A.
    Contraception; 1998 Jan; 57(1):19-21. PubMed ID: 9554246
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Norplant contraceptive implants: rods versus capsules.
    Pasquale SA, Brandeis V, Cruz RI, Kelly S, Sweeney M.
    Contraception; 1987 Sep; 36(3):305-16. PubMed ID: 3119287
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Norplant subdermal contraceptive system: experience in Taiwan.
    Tseng LH, Lee TY, Yang YS, Ko TM, Chuang SM.
    Contraception; 1996 Mar; 53(3):177-80. PubMed ID: 8689883
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 14.