These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
132 related items for PubMed ID: 7801591
1. [Comparison of the tolerance of ionic and nonionic contrast media in coronary angiography]. Savchenko AP, Frolova MI, Pavlov NA. Vestn Rentgenol Radiol; 1993; (6):21-4. PubMed ID: 7801591 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of ionic and non-ionic contrast agents in cardiac catheterization: the effects of ventriculography and coronary arteriography on hemodynamics, electrocardiography, and serum creatinine. Cooper MW, Reed PJ. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1991 Apr; 22(4):267-77. PubMed ID: 1781822 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Hemodynamic and electrocardiographic effects in man of a new nonionic contrast agent (iohexol): advantages over standard ionic agents. Mancini GB, Bloomquist JN, Bhargava V, Stein JB, Lew W, Slutsky RA, Shabetai R, Higgins CB. Am J Cardiol; 1983 Apr; 51(7):1218-22. PubMed ID: 6837464 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparative effects of ionic and nonionic contrast materials on indexes of isovolumic contraction and relaxation in humans. Mancini GB, Atwood JE, Bhargava V, Slutsky RA, Grover M, Higgins CB. Am J Cardiol; 1984 Jan 01; 53(1):228-33. PubMed ID: 6691265 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical superiority of a new nonionic contrast agent (iopamidol) for cardiac angiography. Gertz EW, Wisneski JA, Chiu D, Akin JR, Hu C. J Am Coll Cardiol; 1985 Feb 01; 5(2 Pt 1):250-8. PubMed ID: 3881496 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [Electrocardiographic and hemodynamic adverse effects of contrast media in coronary angiography]. Wagner J, Zwicker B. Z Kardiol; 1994 Feb 01; 83(2):146-54. PubMed ID: 8165845 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Contrast agents for cardiac angiography: effects of a nonionic agent vs. a standard ionic agent. Bettmann MA, Bourdillon PD, Barry WH, Brush KA, Levin DC. Radiology; 1984 Dec 01; 153(3):583-7. PubMed ID: 6387783 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of the electrocardiographic and hemodynamic responses to ionic and nonionic radiocontrast media during left ventriculography: a randomized double-blind study. Salem DN, Konstam MA, Isner JM, Bonin JD. Am Heart J; 1986 Mar 01; 111(3):533-6. PubMed ID: 3006464 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Regional myocardial hemodynamic and metabolic effects of ionic and nonionic contrast media in normal and ischemic states. Gerber KH, Higgins CB, Yuh YS, Koziol JA. Circulation; 1982 Jun 01; 65(7):1307-14. PubMed ID: 7074792 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Influence of low osmolality contrast media on electrophysiology and hemodynamics in coronary angiography: differences between an ionic (ioxaglate) and a nonionic (iohexol) agent. Vik-Mo H, Følling M, Barth P, Nordrehaug JE, Bjørkhaug A, Rosland GA. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1990 Dec 01; 21(4):221-6. PubMed ID: 2276191 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [Coronary arteriography with a plasma-isotonic roentgen contrast medium: effects on ECG, blood pressure and coronary circulation]. Schräder R, Abel J, Sievert H, Friedmann A, Kaltenbach M, Kober G. Z Kardiol; 1989 Jan 01; 78(1):33-40. PubMed ID: 2646839 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparative trial of iohexol 350, a non-ionic contrast medium, with diatrizoate (Urografin 370) in left ventriculography and coronary arteriography. Sullivan ID, Wainwright RJ, Reidy JF, Sowton E. Br Heart J; 1984 Jun 01; 51(6):643-7. PubMed ID: 6375703 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]