These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
150 related items for PubMed ID: 7823365
1. Assessment of carotid artery stenosis by ultrasonography, conventional angiography, and magnetic resonance angiography: correlation with ex vivo measurement of plaque stenosis. Pan XM, Saloner D, Reilly LM, Bowersox JC, Murray SP, Anderson CM, Gooding GA, Rapp JH. J Vasc Surg; 1995 Jan; 21(1):82-8; discussion 88-9. PubMed ID: 7823365 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Detection of carotid artery stenosis using histological specimens: a comparison of CT angiography, magnetic resonance angiography, digital subtraction angiography and Doppler ultrasonography. Netuka D, Belšán T, Broulíková K, Mandys V, Charvát F, Malík J, Coufalová L, Bradáč O, Ostrý S, Beneš V. Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2016 Aug; 158(8):1505-14. PubMed ID: 27255656 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Magnetic resonance angiography, digital subtraction angiography and Doppler ultrasonography in detection of carotid artery stenosis: a comparison with findings from histological specimens. Netuka D, Ostrý S, Belsán T, Rucka D, Mandys V, Charvát F, Bradác O, Benes V. Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2010 Jul; 152(7):1215-21. PubMed ID: 20411283 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of Carotid Doppler Ultrasound to Other Angiographic Modalities in the Measurement of Carotid Artery Stenosis. Boyko M, Kalashyan H, Becher H, Romanchuk H, Saqqur M, Rempel JL, Derksen C, Shuaib A, Khan K. J Neuroimaging; 2018 Nov; 28(6):683-687. PubMed ID: 29917285 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Preoperative diagnosis of carotid artery stenosis: accuracy of noninvasive testing. Nederkoorn PJ, Mali WP, Eikelboom BC, Elgersma OE, Buskens E, Hunink MG, Kappelle LJ, Buijs PC, Wüst AF, van der Lugt A, van der Graaf Y. Stroke; 2002 Aug; 33(8):2003-8. PubMed ID: 12154253 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Cross-sectional magnetic resonance angiography is accurate in predicting degree of carotid stenosis. Morasch MD, Gurjala AN, Washington E, Chiou AC, Simonetti OP, Finn JP, Yao JS. Ann Vasc Surg; 2002 May; 16(3):266-72. PubMed ID: 11957000 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Determination of 60% or greater carotid stenosis: a prospective comparison of magnetic resonance angiography and duplex ultrasound with conventional angiography. Jackson MR, Chang AS, Robles HA, Gillespie DL, Olsen SB, Kaiser WJ, Goff JM, O'Donnell SD, Rich NM. Ann Vasc Surg; 1998 May; 12(3):236-43. PubMed ID: 9588509 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Efficacy of screening MR angiography and Doppler ultrasonography in the evaluation of carotid artery stenosis. White JE, Russell WL, Greer MS, Whittle MT. Am Surg; 1994 May; 60(5):340-8. PubMed ID: 8161084 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]