These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

242 related items for PubMed ID: 7824250

  • 1. The process of resident selection: a view from the residency director's desk.
    Taylor CA, Weinstein L, Mayhew HE.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Feb; 85(2):299-303. PubMed ID: 7824250
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. An analysis of orthopaedic residency selection criteria.
    Bernstein AD, Jazrawi LM, Elbeshbeshy B, Della Valle CJ, Zuckerman JD.
    Bull Hosp Jt Dis; 1995 Feb; 61(1-2):49-57. PubMed ID: 12828380
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Application submission date reflects applicant quality.
    Fuhrman GM, Dada S, Ehleben C.
    J Surg Educ; 2008 Feb; 65(6):397-400. PubMed ID: 19059168
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. United states medical licensing examination scores as a predictor of performance on the annual council of resident education in obstetrics and gynecology examinations.
    Spellacy WN, Downes KL.
    J Reprod Med; 2014 Feb; 59(1-2):17-9. PubMed ID: 24597281
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Residency selection: do the perceptions of US programme directors and applicants match?
    Go PH, Klaassen Z, Chamberlain RS.
    Med Educ; 2012 May; 46(5):491-500. PubMed ID: 22515757
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Electronic residency application service scores: do they correlate with the rank order list for the match?
    Argeles PC, Weiss PM, Koller CA, Kimmel S, Hess LW.
    J Reprod Med; 2006 Jun; 51(6):471-4. PubMed ID: 16846085
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Residency directors' responses to the concept of a proposed electronic residency application service.
    Taylor CA, Mayhew HE, Weinstein L.
    Acad Med; 1994 Feb; 69(2):138-42. PubMed ID: 8311885
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Program directors' criteria for selection into urology residency.
    Weissbart SJ, Stock JA, Wein AJ.
    Urology; 2015 Apr; 85(4):731-6. PubMed ID: 25817098
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Importance of the faculty interview during the resident application process.
    Brothers TE, Wetherholt S.
    J Surg Educ; 2007 Apr; 64(6):378-85. PubMed ID: 18063273
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 13.