These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

113 related items for PubMed ID: 7825431

  • 1. Electromagnetic stimulation of the auditory system of deaf patients.
    Counter SA, Borg E, Bredberg G, Linde G, Vainio M.
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1994 Sep; 114(5):501-9. PubMed ID: 7825431
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Electromagnetic stimulation of the auditory system: effects and side-effects.
    Counter SA.
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1993 Sep; 37():1-32. PubMed ID: 8210963
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Pure-Tone Masking Patterns for Monopolar and Phantom Electrical Stimulation in Cochlear Implants.
    Saoji AA, Koka K, Litvak LM, Finley CC.
    Ear Hear; 2018 Sep; 39(1):124-130. PubMed ID: 28700446
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Extracochlear electrical stimulation.
    Gundersen T, Ramírez-García E, Randa J.
    Scand Audiol; 1984 Sep; 13(1):33-9. PubMed ID: 6719013
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. [Loudness scaling in cochlear implant patients within the scope of preoperative evaluation].
    Müller J, Schön F.
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1994 Mar; 73(3):128-31. PubMed ID: 8172631
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Electrical cochlear stimulation in the deaf cat: comparisons between psychophysical and central auditory neuronal thresholds.
    Beitel RE, Snyder RL, Schreiner CE, Raggio MW, Leake PA.
    J Neurophysiol; 2000 Apr; 83(4):2145-62. PubMed ID: 10758124
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Perfusion SPECT in cochlear implantation and promontory stimulation.
    Allen A, Barnes A, Singh RS, Patterson J, Hadley DM, Wyper D.
    Nucl Med Commun; 2004 May; 25(5):521-5. PubMed ID: 15100513
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Auditory steady-state responses in cochlear implant users: Effect of modulation frequency and stimulation artifacts.
    Gransier R, Deprez H, Hofmann M, Moonen M, van Wieringen A, Wouters J.
    Hear Res; 2016 May; 335():149-160. PubMed ID: 26994660
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. The cochlear implant; basic principles.
    Brackmann DE.
    Laryngoscope; 1976 Mar; 86(3):373-88. PubMed ID: 1256212
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. [Experience with electrostimulation of the acoustic nerve before cochlea implantation].
    Hoth S, Lenarz T.
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1991 Apr; 70(4):199-207. PubMed ID: 2054026
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Bilateral input protects the cortex from unilaterally-driven reorganization in children who are deaf.
    Gordon KA, Wong DD, Papsin BC.
    Brain; 2013 May; 136(Pt 5):1609-25. PubMed ID: 23576127
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 6.